Lemma 34.3.20. Let S be a scheme contained in a big Zariski site \mathit{Sch}_{Zar}. A sheaf \mathcal{F} on the big Zariski site (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{Zar} is given by the following data:
for every T/S \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{Zar}) a sheaf \mathcal{F}_ T on T,
for every f : T' \to T in (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{Zar} a map c_ f : f^{-1}\mathcal{F}_ T \to \mathcal{F}_{T'}.
These data are subject to the following conditions:
given any f : T' \to T and g : T'' \to T' in (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{Zar} the composition c_ g \circ g^{-1}c_ f is equal to c_{f \circ g}, and
if f : T' \to T in (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{Zar} is an open immersion then c_ f is an isomorphism.
Proof.
This lemma follows from a purely sheaf theoretic statement discussed in Sites, Remark 7.26.7. We also give a direct proof in this case.
Given a sheaf \mathcal{F} on \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{Zar}) we set \mathcal{F}_ T = i_ p^{-1}\mathcal{F} where p : T \to S is the structure morphism. Note that \mathcal{F}_ T(U) = \mathcal{F}(U'/S) for any open U \subset T, and U' \to T an open immersion in (\mathit{Sch}/T)_{Zar} with image U, see Lemmas 34.3.12 and 34.3.13. Hence given f : T' \to T over S and U, U' \to T we get a canonical map \mathcal{F}_ T(U) = \mathcal{F}(U'/S) \to \mathcal{F}(U'\times _ T T'/S) = \mathcal{F}_{T'}(f^{-1}(U)) where the middle is the restriction map of \mathcal{F} with respect to the morphism U' \times _ T T' \to U' over S. The collection of these maps are compatible with restrictions, and hence define an f-map c_ f from \mathcal{F}_ T to \mathcal{F}_{T'}, see Sheaves, Definition 6.21.7 and the discussion surrounding it. It is clear that c_{f \circ g} is the composition of c_ f and c_ g, since composition of restriction maps of \mathcal{F} gives restriction maps.
Conversely, given a system (\mathcal{F}_ T, c_ f) as in the lemma we may define a presheaf \mathcal{F} on \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{Zar}) by simply setting \mathcal{F}(T/S) = \mathcal{F}_ T(T). As restriction mapping, given f : T' \to T we set for s \in \mathcal{F}(T) the pullback f^*(s) equal to c_ f(s) (where we think of c_ f as an f-map again). The condition on the c_ f guarantees that pullbacks satisfy the required functoriality property. We omit the verification that this is a sheaf. It is clear that the constructions so defined are mutually inverse.
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: