Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 34.3.20. Let S be a scheme contained in a big Zariski site \mathit{Sch}_{Zar}. A sheaf \mathcal{F} on the big Zariski site (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{Zar} is given by the following data:

  1. for every T/S \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{Zar}) a sheaf \mathcal{F}_ T on T,

  2. for every f : T' \to T in (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{Zar} a map c_ f : f^{-1}\mathcal{F}_ T \to \mathcal{F}_{T'}.

These data are subject to the following conditions:

  1. given any f : T' \to T and g : T'' \to T' in (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{Zar} the composition c_ g \circ g^{-1}c_ f is equal to c_{f \circ g}, and

  2. if f : T' \to T in (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{Zar} is an open immersion then c_ f is an isomorphism.

Proof. This lemma follows from a purely sheaf theoretic statement discussed in Sites, Remark 7.26.7. We also give a direct proof in this case.

Given a sheaf \mathcal{F} on \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{Zar}) we set \mathcal{F}_ T = i_ p^{-1}\mathcal{F} where p : T \to S is the structure morphism. Note that \mathcal{F}_ T(U) = \mathcal{F}(U'/S) for any open U \subset T, and U' \to T an open immersion in (\mathit{Sch}/T)_{Zar} with image U, see Lemmas 34.3.12 and 34.3.13. Hence given f : T' \to T over S and U, U' \to T we get a canonical map \mathcal{F}_ T(U) = \mathcal{F}(U'/S) \to \mathcal{F}(U'\times _ T T'/S) = \mathcal{F}_{T'}(f^{-1}(U)) where the middle is the restriction map of \mathcal{F} with respect to the morphism U' \times _ T T' \to U' over S. The collection of these maps are compatible with restrictions, and hence define an f-map c_ f from \mathcal{F}_ T to \mathcal{F}_{T'}, see Sheaves, Definition 6.21.7 and the discussion surrounding it. It is clear that c_{f \circ g} is the composition of c_ f and c_ g, since composition of restriction maps of \mathcal{F} gives restriction maps.

Conversely, given a system (\mathcal{F}_ T, c_ f) as in the lemma we may define a presheaf \mathcal{F} on \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{Zar}) by simply setting \mathcal{F}(T/S) = \mathcal{F}_ T(T). As restriction mapping, given f : T' \to T we set for s \in \mathcal{F}(T) the pullback f^*(s) equal to c_ f(s) (where we think of c_ f as an f-map again). The condition on the c_ f guarantees that pullbacks satisfy the required functoriality property. We omit the verification that this is a sheaf. It is clear that the constructions so defined are mutually inverse. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 34.3: The Zariski topology

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.