## 39.2 Notation

Let $S$ be a scheme. If $U$, $T$ are schemes over $S$ we denote $U(T)$ for the set of $T$-valued points of $U$ *over* $S$. In a formula: $U(T) = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ S(T, U)$. We try to reserve the letter $T$ to denote a “test scheme” over $S$, as in the discussion that follows. Suppose we are given schemes $X$, $Y$ over $S$ and a morphism of schemes $f : X \to Y$ over $S$. For any scheme $T$ over $S$ we get an induced map of sets

which as indicated we denote by $f$ also. In fact this construction is functorial in the scheme $T/S$. Yoneda's Lemma, see Categories, Lemma 4.3.5, says that $f$ determines and is determined by this transformation of functors $f : h_ X \to h_ Y$. More generally, we use the same notation for maps between fibre products. For example, if $X$, $Y$, $Z$ are schemes over $S$, and if $m : X \times _ S Y \to Z \times _ S Z$ is a morphism of schemes over $S$, then we think of $m$ as corresponding to a collection of maps between $T$-valued points

And so on and so forth.

We continue our convention to label projection maps starting with index $0$, so we have $\text{pr}_0 : X \times _ S Y \to X$ and $\text{pr}_1 : X \times _ S Y \to Y$.

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)