Proof.
See More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.6.8 for a more general statement and proof. What follows is a sketch of the proof in the current case.
Firstly, one checks both properties are local on the source and the target. This we may assume that S and X are affine. Say X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B) and S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R). Say T = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(C). Let J be the square-zero ideal of C with T_0 = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(C/J). Assume that we are given the diagram
\xymatrix{ & B \ar[d]^\phi \ar[rd]^{\bar{\phi }} & \\ R \ar[r] \ar[ur] & C \ar[r] & C/J }
Secondly, one checks that the association \phi ' \mapsto \phi ' - \phi gives a bijection between the set of liftings of \bar{\phi } and the module \text{Der}_ R(B, J). Thus, we obtain the implication (1) \Rightarrow (2) via the description of unramified morphisms having trivial module of differentials, see Theorem 41.4.1.
To obtain the reverse implication, consider the surjection q : C = (B \otimes _ R B)/I^2 \to B = C/J defined by the square zero ideal J = I/I^2 where I is the kernel of the multiplication map B \otimes _ R B \to B. We already have a lifting B \to C defined by, say, b \mapsto b \otimes 1. Thus, by the same reasoning as above, we obtain a bijective correspondence between liftings of \text{id} : B \to C/J and \text{Der}_ R(B, J). The hypothesis therefore implies that the latter module is trivial. But we know that J \cong \Omega _{B/R}. Thus, B/R is unramified.
\square
Comments (0)