History of tag 02H6
Go back to the tag's page.
type |
time |
link |
changed the proof
|
2016-06-15 |
e352ea3 |
Clarify stuff on deformations of maps thickenings
|
changed the statement
|
2012-07-09 |
e58d274 |
Cosmetic change
Given a named theorem, such as Chevalley's theorem, we now code
this as
\begin{theorem}[Chevalley's theorem]
\label{theorem-chevalley}
and not as
\begin{theorem}
\label{theorem-chevalley}
(Chevalley's Theorem.)
|
changed the proof
|
2012-05-21 |
f258fb9 |
move a chapter and rename a chapter
We moved the chapter "Cohomology of Algebraic Spaces" earlier so
we can use the results earlier in the treatment of algebraic
spaces. Also, we finally renamed the chapter "Coherent
Cohomology" to "Cohomology of Schemes" which is better.
|
changed the proof
|
2011-12-24 |
8a291eb |
Cleanup section formally smooth ring maps
|
changed the proof
|
2011-08-11 |
1b77f34 |
LaTeX: Hom and SheafHom
Introduced the macros
\def\Hom{\mathop{\rm Hom}\nolimits}
\def\SheafHom{\mathop{\mathcal{H}\!{\it om}}\nolimits}
and replaced all the occurences of \text{Hom} and \textit{Hom}
with these.
|
changed the proof
|
2011-08-10 |
65ce54f |
LaTeX: \Spec
Introduced the macro
\def\Spec{\mathop{\rm Spec}}
and changed all the occurences of \text{Spec} into \Spec.
|
changed the proof
|
2011-04-04 |
ab0405b |
Infinitesimal lifting criterion
Proof (finally) of the relation between smooth and formally
smooth morphisms of algebraic spaces.
|
changed the proof
|
2011-03-29 |
ee75333 |
Bunch of changes
(1) Starting to write about thickenings of algebraic spaces
(2) Change Omega^1_{X/S} to Omega_{X/S}
(3) Introduced universal homeomorphisms for algebraic spaces
(4) If X ---> Y is a surjective, integral morphism of schemes
and X is an affine scheme, then Y is an affine scheme
(4) Topological invariance of the site X_{spaces, etale} of an
algebraic space X (proof unfinished}
In order to see that also X_{etale} is a topological invariant
we (I think) need to prove the following result: If X --> Y is a
integral, universally injective, surjective morphism of
algebraic spaces then X is a scheme if and only if Y is a
scheme. There are two proofs of this result in the literature
(one by David Rydh and one by Brian Conrad); both reduce the
result to the Noetherian case by limit arguments. I would
prefer a more direct argument...
|
changed the proof
|
2010-04-08 |
efb89d2 |
More Morphisms: Edit
Explain when it is neccesary to have affine test schemes and
when it is unnecessary.
|
changed the proof
|
2010-03-01 |
ac062ff |
More Morphisms Spaces: Module of differentials
Started to write about module of differentials of a morphism of
algebraic spaces. We want to use it in the discussion of
formally smooth morphisms.
This required some preliminary work improving the exposition in
a few other plaves.
|
changed the statement
|
2009-05-28 |
1ea5922 |
Lifting criterion smoothness using artinian rings
modified: algebra.tex
modified: more-morphisms.tex
modified: morphisms.tex
|
assigned tag 02H6
|
2009-05-27 |
b91c0bf
|
Forgot to add more-morphisms.tex to tags Makefile
Added new tags to tags/tags
modified: tags/Makefile
modified: tags/tags
|
created statement with label lemma-smooth-formally-smooth in more-morphisms.tex
|
2009-05-27 |
f478241 |
New file more-morphisms.tex to start advanced material on morphisms
modified: Makefile
modified: algebra.tex
modified: browse.html
modified: chapters.tex
modified: cohomology.tex
new file: more-morphisms.tex
modified: morphisms.tex
modified: preamble.tex
modified: scripts/functions.py
|