Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 35.25.2. A universally injective étale morphism is an open immersion.

First proof. Let f : X \to Y be an étale morphism which is universally injective. Then f is open (Morphisms, Lemma 29.36.13) hence we can replace Y by f(X) and we may assume that f is surjective. Then f is bijective and open hence a homeomorphism. Hence f is quasi-compact. Thus by Lemma 35.25.1 it suffices to show that f is a monomorphism. As X \to Y is étale the morphism \Delta _{X/Y} : X \to X \times _ Y X is an open immersion by Morphisms, Lemma 29.35.13 (and Morphisms, Lemma 29.36.16). As f is universally injective \Delta _{X/Y} is also surjective, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.10.2. Hence \Delta _{X/Y} is an isomorphism, i.e., X \to Y is a monomorphism. \square

Second proof. Let f : X \to Y be an étale morphism which is universally injective. Then f is open (Morphisms, Lemma 29.36.13) hence we can replace Y by f(X) and we may assume that f is surjective. Since the hypotheses remain satisfied after any base change, we conclude that f is a universal homeomorphism. Therefore f is integral, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.45.5. It follows that f is finite by Morphisms, Lemma 29.44.4. It follows that f is finite locally free by Morphisms, Lemma 29.48.2. To finish the proof, it suffices that f is finite locally free of degree 1 (a finite locally free morphism of degree 1 is an isomorphism). There is decomposition of Y into open and closed subschemes V_ d such that f^{-1}(V_ d) \to V_ d is finite locally free of degree d, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.48.5. If V_ d is not empty, we can pick a morphism \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to V_ d \subset Y where k is an algebraically closed field (just take the algebraic closure of the residue field of some point of V_ d). Then \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \times _ Y X \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) is a disjoint union of copies of \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k), by Morphisms, Lemma 29.36.7 and the fact that k is algebraically closed. However, since f is universally injective, there can only be one copy and hence d = 1 as desired. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 3 comment(s) on Section 35.25: Application of fpqc descent of properties of morphisms

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.