Lemma 20.17.1. Let
be a commutative diagram of ringed spaces. Let $\mathcal{F}^\bullet $ be a bounded below complex of $\mathcal{O}_ X$-modules. Assume both $g$ and $g'$ are flat. Then there exists a canonical base change map
in $D^{+}(S')$.
We will need to know how to construct the base change map in some cases. Since we have not yet discussed derived pullback we only discuss this in the case of a base change by a flat morphism of ringed spaces. Before we state the result, let us discuss flat pullback on the derived category. Namely, suppose that $g : X \to Y$ is a flat morphism of ringed spaces. By Modules, Lemma 17.20.2 the functor $g^* : \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O}_ Y) \to \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ is exact. Hence it has a derived functor
which is computed by simply pulling back an representative of a given object in $D^{+}(Y)$, see Derived Categories, Lemma 13.16.9. Hence as indicated we indicate this functor by $g^*$ rather than $Lg^*$.
Lemma 20.17.1. Let
be a commutative diagram of ringed spaces. Let $\mathcal{F}^\bullet $ be a bounded below complex of $\mathcal{O}_ X$-modules. Assume both $g$ and $g'$ are flat. Then there exists a canonical base change map
in $D^{+}(S')$.
Proof. Choose injective resolutions $\mathcal{F}^\bullet \to \mathcal{I}^\bullet $ and $(g')^*\mathcal{F}^\bullet \to \mathcal{J}^\bullet $. By Lemma 20.11.11 we see that $(g')_*\mathcal{J}^\bullet $ is a complex of injectives representing $R(g')_*(g')^*\mathcal{F}^\bullet $. Hence by Derived Categories, Lemmas 13.18.6 and 13.18.7 the arrow $\beta $ in the diagram
exists and is unique up to homotopy. Pushing down to $S$ we get
By adjunction of $g^*$ and $g_*$ we get a map of complexes $g^*f_*\mathcal{I}^\bullet \to (f')_*\mathcal{J}^\bullet $. Note that this map is unique up to homotopy since the only choice in the whole process was the choice of the map $\beta $ and everything was done on the level of complexes. $\square$
Remark 20.17.2. The “correct” version of the base change map is the map
The construction of this map involves unbounded complexes, see Remark 20.28.3.
Comments (0)