Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 42.18.2. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X be locally of finite type over S. Assume X is integral and n = \dim _\delta (X). Let f \in R(X)^*. Let U \subset X be a nonempty open such that f corresponds to a section f \in \Gamma (U, \mathcal{O}_ X^*). Let Y \subset X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S be the closure of the graph of f : U \to \mathbf{P}^1_ S. Then

  1. the projection morphism p : Y \to X is proper,

  2. p|_{p^{-1}(U)} : p^{-1}(U) \to U is an isomorphism,

  3. the pullbacks Y_0 = q^{-1}D_0 and Y_\infty = q^{-1}D_\infty via the morphism q : Y \to \mathbf{P}^1_ S are defined (Divisors, Definition 31.13.12),

  4. we have

    \text{div}_ Y(f) = [Y_0]_{n - 1} - [Y_\infty ]_{n - 1}
  5. we have

    \text{div}_ X(f) = p_*\text{div}_ Y(f)
  6. if we view Y_0 and Y_\infty as closed subschemes of X via the morphism p then we have

    \text{div}_ X(f) = [Y_0]_{n - 1} - [Y_\infty ]_{n - 1}

Proof. Since X is integral, we see that U is integral. Hence Y is integral, and (1, f)(U) \subset Y is an open dense subscheme. Also, note that the closed subscheme Y \subset X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S does not depend on the choice of the open U, since after all it is the closure of the one point set \{ \eta '\} = \{ (1, f)(\eta )\} where \eta \in X is the generic point. Having said this let us prove the assertions of the lemma.

For (1) note that p is the composition of the closed immersion Y \to X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S = \mathbf{P}^1_ X with the proper morphism \mathbf{P}^1_ X \to X. As a composition of proper morphisms is proper (Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.4) we conclude.

It is clear that Y \cap U \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S = (1, f)(U). Thus (2) follows. It also follows that \dim _\delta (Y) = n.

Note that q(\eta ') = f(\eta ) is not contained in D_0 or D_\infty since f \in R(X)^*. Hence (3) by Divisors, Lemma 31.13.13. We obtain \dim _\delta (Y_0) = n - 1 and \dim _\delta (Y_\infty ) = n - 1 from Lemma 42.16.1.

Consider the effective Cartier divisor Y_0. At every point \xi \in Y_0 we have f \in \mathcal{O}_{Y, \xi } and the local equation for Y_0 is given by f. In particular, if \delta (\xi ) = n - 1 so \xi is the generic point of a integral closed subscheme Z of \delta -dimension n - 1, then we see that the coefficient of [Z] in \text{div}_ Y(f) is

\text{ord}_ Z(f) = \text{length}_{\mathcal{O}_{Y, \xi }} (\mathcal{O}_{Y, \xi }/f\mathcal{O}_{Y, \xi }) = \text{length}_{\mathcal{O}_{Y, \xi }} (\mathcal{O}_{Y_0, \xi })

which is the coefficient of [Z] in [Y_0]_{n - 1}. A similar argument using the rational function 1/f shows that -[Y_\infty ] agrees with the terms with negative coefficients in the expression for \text{div}_ Y(f). Hence (4) follows.

Note that D_0 \to S is an isomorphism. Hence we see that X \times _ S D_0 \to X is an isomorphism as well. Clearly we have Y_0 = Y \cap X \times _ S D_0 (scheme theoretic intersection) inside X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S. Hence it is really the case that Y_0 \to X is a closed immersion. It follows that

p_*\mathcal{O}_{Y_0} = \mathcal{O}_{Y'_0}

where Y'_0 \subset X is the image of Y_0 \to X. By Lemma 42.12.4 we have p_*[Y_0]_{n - 1} = [Y'_0]_{n - 1}. The same is true for D_\infty and Y_\infty . Hence (6) is a consequence of (5). Finally, (5) follows immediately from Lemma 42.18.1. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.