Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Definition 42.19.1. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X be a scheme locally of finite type over S. Let k \in \mathbf{Z}.

  1. Given any locally finite collection \{ W_ j \subset X\} of integral closed subschemes with \dim _\delta (W_ j) = k + 1, and any f_ j \in R(W_ j)^* we may consider

    \sum (i_ j)_*\text{div}(f_ j) \in Z_ k(X)

    where i_ j : W_ j \to X is the inclusion morphism. This makes sense as the morphism \coprod i_ j : \coprod W_ j \to X is proper.

  2. We say that \alpha \in Z_ k(X) is rationally equivalent to zero if \alpha is a cycle of the form displayed above.

  3. We say \alpha , \beta \in Z_ k(X) are rationally equivalent and we write \alpha \sim _{rat} \beta if \alpha - \beta is rationally equivalent to zero.

  4. We define

    \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(X) = Z_ k(X) / \sim _{rat}

    to be the Chow group of k-cycles on X. This is sometimes called the Chow group of k-cycles modulo rational equivalence on X.


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.