Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 42.28.3. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X be locally of finite type over S. Let \mathcal{L}, \mathcal{N} be invertible on X. For any \alpha \in \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _{k + 2}(X) we have

c_1(\mathcal{L}) \cap c_1(\mathcal{N}) \cap \alpha = c_1(\mathcal{N}) \cap c_1(\mathcal{L}) \cap \alpha

as elements of \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(X).

Proof. Write \alpha = \sum m_ j[Z_ j] for some locally finite collection of integral closed subschemes Z_ j \subset X with \dim _\delta (Z_ j) = k + 2. Consider the proper morphism p : \coprod Z_ j \to X. Set \alpha ' = \sum m_ j[Z_ j] as a (k + 2)-cycle on \coprod Z_ j. By several applications of Lemma 42.26.4 we see that c_1(\mathcal{L}) \cap c_1(\mathcal{N}) \cap \alpha = p_*(c_1(p^*\mathcal{L}) \cap c_1(p^*\mathcal{N}) \cap \alpha ') and c_1(\mathcal{N}) \cap c_1(\mathcal{L}) \cap \alpha = p_*(c_1(p^*\mathcal{N}) \cap c_1(p^*\mathcal{L}) \cap \alpha '). Hence it suffices to prove the formula in case X is integral and \alpha = [X]. In this case the result follows from Lemma 42.28.1 and the definitions. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 42.28: Intersecting with an invertible sheaf and rational equivalence

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.