Lemma 42.30.1. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X be locally of finite type over S. Let X be integral and n = \dim _\delta (X). Let i : D \to X be an effective Cartier divisor. Let \mathcal{N} be an invertible \mathcal{O}_ X-module and let t be a nonzero meromorphic section of \mathcal{N}. Then i^*\text{div}_\mathcal {N}(t) = c_1(\mathcal{N}|_ D) \cap [D]_{n - 1} in \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _{n - 2}(D).
Proof. Write \text{div}_\mathcal {N}(t) = \sum \text{ord}_{Z_ i, \mathcal{N}}(t)[Z_ i] for some integral closed subschemes Z_ i \subset X of \delta -dimension n - 1. We may assume that the family \{ Z_ i\} is locally finite, that t \in \Gamma (U, \mathcal{N}|_ U) is a generator where U = X \setminus \bigcup Z_ i, and that every irreducible component of D is one of the Z_ i, see Divisors, Lemmas 31.26.1, 31.26.4, and 31.27.2.
Set \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{O}_ X(D). Denote s \in \Gamma (X, \mathcal{O}_ X(D)) = \Gamma (X, \mathcal{L}) the canonical section. We will apply the discussion of Section 42.27 to our current situation. For each i let \xi _ i \in Z_ i be its generic point. Let B_ i = \mathcal{O}_{X, \xi _ i}. For each i we pick generators s_ i \in \mathcal{L}_{\xi _ i} and t_ i \in \mathcal{N}_{\xi _ i} over B_ i but we insist that we pick s_ i = s if Z_ i \not\subset D. Write s = f_ i s_ i and t = g_ i t_ i with f_ i, g_ i \in B_ i. Then \text{ord}_{Z_ i, \mathcal{N}}(t) = \text{ord}_{B_ i}(g_ i). On the other hand, we have f_ i \in B_ i and
because of our choices of s_ i. We claim that
as cycles. More precisely, the right hand side is a cycle representing the left hand side. Namely, this is clear by our formula for \text{div}_\mathcal {N}(t) and the fact that \text{div}_{\mathcal{L}|_{Z_ i}}(s_ i|_{Z_ i}) = [Z(s_ i|_{Z_ i})]_{n - 2} = [Z_ i \cap D]_{n - 2} when Z_ i \not\subset D because in that case s_ i|_{Z_ i} = s|_{Z_ i} is a regular section, see Lemma 42.24.2. Similarly,
The key formula (Lemma 42.27.1) gives the equality
of cycles. If Z_ i \not\subset D, then f_ i = 1 and hence \text{div}_{Z_ i}(\partial _{B_ i}(f_ i, g_ i)) = 0. Thus we get a rational equivalence between our specific cycles representing i^*\text{div}_\mathcal {N}(t) and c_1(\mathcal{N}) \cap [D]_{n - 1} on D. This finishes the proof. \square
Comments (2)
Comment #6643 by WhatJiaranEatsTonight on
Comment #6868 by Johan on
There are also: