Lemma 42.32.1. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X, Y be locally of finite type over S. Let f : X \to Y be a flat morphism of relative dimension r. Assume that for every y \in Y, there exists an open neighbourhood U \subset Y such that f|_{f^{-1}(U)} : f^{-1}(U) \to U is identified with the morphism U \times \mathbf{A}^ r \to U. Then f^* : \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(Y) \to \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _{k + r}(X) is surjective for all k \in \mathbf{Z}.
Proof. Let \alpha \in \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _{k + r}(X). Write \alpha = \sum m_ j[W_ j] with m_ j \not= 0 and W_ j pairwise distinct integral closed subschemes of \delta -dimension k + r. Then the family \{ W_ j\} is locally finite in X. For any quasi-compact open V \subset Y we see that f^{-1}(V) \cap W_ j is nonempty only for finitely many j. Hence the collection Z_ j = \overline{f(W_ j)} of closures of images is a locally finite collection of integral closed subschemes of Y.
Consider the fibre product diagrams
Suppose that [W_ j] \in Z_{k + r}(f^{-1}(Z_ j)) is rationally equivalent to f_ j^*\beta _ j for some k-cycle \beta _ j \in \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(Z_ j). Then \beta = \sum m_ j \beta _ j will be a k-cycle on Y and f^*\beta = \sum m_ j f_ j^*\beta _ j will be rationally equivalent to \alpha (see Remark 42.19.6). This reduces us to the case Y integral, and \alpha = [W] for some integral closed subscheme of X dominating Y. In particular we may assume that d = \dim _\delta (Y) < \infty .
Hence we can use induction on d = \dim _\delta (Y). If d < k, then \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _{k + r}(X) = 0 and the lemma holds. By assumption there exists a dense open V \subset Y such that f^{-1}(V) \cong V \times \mathbf{A}^ r as schemes over V. Suppose that we can show that \alpha |_{f^{-1}(V)} = f^*\beta for some \beta \in Z_ k(V). By Lemma 42.14.2 we see that \beta = \beta '|_ V for some \beta ' \in Z_ k(Y). By the exact sequence \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(f^{-1}(Y \setminus V)) \to \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(X) \to \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(f^{-1}(V)) of Lemma 42.19.3 we see that \alpha - f^*\beta ' comes from a cycle \alpha ' \in \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _{k + r}(f^{-1}(Y \setminus V)). Since \dim _\delta (Y \setminus V) < d we win by induction on d.
Thus we may assume that X = Y \times \mathbf{A}^ r. In this case we can factor f as
Hence it suffices to do the case r = 1. By the argument in the second paragraph of the proof we are reduced to the case \alpha = [W], Y integral, and W \to Y dominant. Again we can do induction on d = \dim _\delta (Y). If W = Y \times \mathbf{A}^1, then [W] = f^*[Y]. Lastly, W \subset Y \times \mathbf{A}^1 is a proper inclusion, then W \to Y induces a finite field extension R(W)/R(Y). Let P(T) \in R(Y)[T] be the monic irreducible polynomial such that the generic fibre of W \to Y is cut out by P in \mathbf{A}^1_{R(Y)}. Let V \subset Y be a nonempty open such that P \in \Gamma (V, \mathcal{O}_ Y)[T], and such that W \cap f^{-1}(V) is still cut out by P. Then we see that \alpha |_{f^{-1}(V)} \sim _{rat} 0 and hence \alpha \sim _{rat} \alpha ' for some cycle \alpha ' on (Y \setminus V) \times \mathbf{A}^1. By induction on the dimension we win. \square
Comments (0)