Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

The Stacks project

History of tag 03DI

Go back to the tag's page.

type time link
changed the proof 2011-08-13 4ea0b65
Whitespace changes
changed the statement and the proof 2011-08-12 dd4090b
LaTeX: Remove useless brackets
changed the proof 2011-08-11 f2e3127
LaTeX: \Sh

	Introduced the macro

	\def\Sh{\mathop{\textit{Sh}}\nolimits}

	and replaced all occurences of \textit{Sh} with \Sh.
changed the statement 2011-08-11 4c15ebf
LaTeX: \Ob

	Introduced a macro

	\def\Ob{\mathop{\rm Ob}\nolimits}

	and replaced any occurence of \text{Ob}( with \Ob(. There are
	still some occurences of \text{Ob} but these are sets, not the
	operator that takes the set of objects of a category.
changed the statement and the proof 2011-08-11 aaf93e6
LaTeX: \Mor

	Introduced a macro

	\def\Mor{\mathop{\rm Mor}\nolimits}

	and replaced all the occurences of \text{Mor} with \Mor.
changed the proof 2010-05-12 e7ae4f0
Relocalizing morphisms of (ringed) topoi

	There is quite a bit of duplication here, but it seems
	convenient to be able to talk about this both when given
	explicit sites defining the topoi and when you are just given an
	abstract morphism of (ringed) topoi.
assigned tag 03DI 2009-10-06 422373a
TAGS: added new tags

	modified:   tags/tags
changed the statement and the proof 2009-10-06 612f789
Modules on sites: Extension by zero is exact

	This is now easy.

	modified:   sites-modules.tex
changed the statement and the proof 2009-10-06 81eb574
Modules on Sites: Corrected lemma on extension by zero

	There is an explicit description of j_{U!} which shows also that
	it is an exact functor on the category of modules, and which we
	will use later to show that injection modules restrict to
	injection O_U modules.

	modified:   sites-modules.tex
created statement with label lemma-extension-by-zero in sites-modules.tex 2009-10-05 1764ce1
Modules on Sites: Somewhat satisfactory explanation of local properties
of modules

	There are several improvements that can be made here, but for
	the moment this is OK. In particular what is the correct version
	of the relationship between localization and morphisms of
	sites? Is it just completely general?

	modified:   descent.tex
	modified:   modules.tex
	modified:   sites-modules.tex
	modified:   sites.tex
	modified:   tags/tags