History of tag 03DI
Go back to the tag's page.
type |
time |
link |
changed the proof
|
2011-08-13 |
4ea0b65 |
Whitespace changes
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2011-08-12 |
dd4090b |
LaTeX: Remove useless brackets
|
changed the proof
|
2011-08-11 |
f2e3127 |
LaTeX: \Sh
Introduced the macro
\def\Sh{\mathop{\textit{Sh}}\nolimits}
and replaced all occurences of \textit{Sh} with \Sh.
|
changed the statement
|
2011-08-11 |
4c15ebf |
LaTeX: \Ob
Introduced a macro
\def\Ob{\mathop{\rm Ob}\nolimits}
and replaced any occurence of \text{Ob}( with \Ob(. There are
still some occurences of \text{Ob} but these are sets, not the
operator that takes the set of objects of a category.
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2011-08-11 |
aaf93e6 |
LaTeX: \Mor
Introduced a macro
\def\Mor{\mathop{\rm Mor}\nolimits}
and replaced all the occurences of \text{Mor} with \Mor.
|
changed the proof
|
2010-05-12 |
e7ae4f0 |
Relocalizing morphisms of (ringed) topoi
There is quite a bit of duplication here, but it seems
convenient to be able to talk about this both when given
explicit sites defining the topoi and when you are just given an
abstract morphism of (ringed) topoi.
|
assigned tag 03DI
|
2009-10-06 |
422373a
|
TAGS: added new tags
modified: tags/tags
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2009-10-06 |
612f789 |
Modules on sites: Extension by zero is exact
This is now easy.
modified: sites-modules.tex
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2009-10-06 |
81eb574 |
Modules on Sites: Corrected lemma on extension by zero
There is an explicit description of j_{U!} which shows also that
it is an exact functor on the category of modules, and which we
will use later to show that injection modules restrict to
injection O_U modules.
modified: sites-modules.tex
|
created statement with label lemma-extension-by-zero in sites-modules.tex
|
2009-10-05 |
1764ce1 |
Modules on Sites: Somewhat satisfactory explanation of local properties
of modules
There are several improvements that can be made here, but for
the moment this is OK. In particular what is the correct version
of the relationship between localization and morphisms of
sites? Is it just completely general?
modified: descent.tex
modified: modules.tex
modified: sites-modules.tex
modified: sites.tex
modified: tags/tags
|