Definition 63.12.1. Let $\Lambda $ be a (possibly noncommutative) ring. An object $K\in D(\Lambda )$ has *finite $\text{Tor}$-dimension* if there exist $a, b \in \mathbf{Z}$ such that for any right $\Lambda $-module $N$, we have $H^ i(N \otimes _{\Lambda }^\mathbf {L} K) = 0$ for all $i \not\in [a, b]$.

## 63.12 Characterizing perfect objects

For the commutative case see More on Algebra, Sections 15.64, 15.66, and 15.74.

This in particular means that $K \in D^ b(\Lambda )$ as we see by taking $N = \Lambda $.

Lemma 63.12.2. Let $\Lambda $ be a left Noetherian ring and $K\in D(\Lambda )$. Then $K$ is perfect if and only if the two following conditions hold:

$K$ has finite $\text{Tor}$-dimension, and

for all $i \in \mathbf{Z}$, $H^ i(K)$ is a finite $\Lambda $-module.

**Proof.**
See More on Algebra, Lemma 15.74.2 for the proof in the commutative case.
$\square$

The reader is strongly urged to try and prove this. The proof relies on the fact that a finite module on a finitely left-presented ring is flat if and only if it is projective.

Remark 63.12.3. A variant of this lemma is to consider a Noetherian scheme $X$ and the category $D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ of complexes which are locally quasi-isomorphic to a finite complex of finite locally free $\mathcal{O}_ X$-modules. Objects $K$ of $D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ can be characterized by having coherent cohomology sheaves and bounded tor dimension.

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)