Loading web-font TeX/Math/Italic

The Stacks project

64.20 Cohomological interpretation

This is how Grothendieck interpreted the L-function.

Theorem 64.20.1 (Finite Coefficients). Let X be a scheme of finite type over a finite field k. Let \Lambda be a finite ring of order prime to the characteristic of k and \mathcal{F} a constructible flat \Lambda -module on X_{\acute{e}tale}. Then

L(X, \mathcal{F}) = \det (1 - \pi _ X^*\ T |_{R\Gamma _ c(X_{\bar k}, \mathcal{F})})^{-1} \in \Lambda [[T]].

Proof. Omitted. \square

Thus far, we don't even know whether each cohomology group H^ i_ c(X_{\bar k}, \mathcal{F}) is free.

Theorem 64.20.2 (Adic sheaves). Let X be a scheme of finite type over a finite field k, and \mathcal{F} a \mathbf{Q}_\ell -sheaf on X. Then

L(X, \mathcal{F}) = \prod \nolimits _ i \det (1 - \pi _ X^*T |_{H_ c^ i(X_{\bar k} , \mathcal{F})})^{(-1)^{i + 1}} \in \mathbf{Q}_\ell [[T]].

Proof. This is sketched below. \square

Remark 64.20.3. Since we have only developed some theory of traces and not of determinants, Theorem 64.20.1 is harder to prove than Theorem 64.20.2. We will only prove the latter, for the former see [SGA4.5]. Observe also that there is no version of this theorem more general for \mathbf{Z}_\ell coefficients since there is no \ell -torsion.

We reduce the proof of Theorem 64.20.2 to a trace formula. Since \mathbf{Q}_\ell has characteristic 0, it suffices to prove the equality after taking logarithmic derivatives. More precisely, we apply T\frac{d}{dT} \log to both sides. We have on the one hand

\begin{align*} T \frac{d}{dT} \log L(X, \mathcal{F}) & = T\frac{d}{dT} \log \prod _{x \in |X|} \det (1 - \pi _ x^* T^{\deg x} |_{\mathcal{F}_{\bar x}})^{-1} \\ & = \sum _{x \in |X|} T \frac{d}{dT} \log ( \det (1 - \pi _ x^* T^{\deg x} |_{\mathcal{F}_{\bar x}})^{-1}) \\ & = \sum _{x \in |X|} \deg x \sum _{n \geq 1} \text{Tr}((\pi _ x^ n)^* |_{\mathcal{F}_{\bar x}}) T^{n\deg x} \end{align*}

where the last equality results from the formula

T\frac{d}{dT}\log \left(\det \left(1-fT|_ M\right)^{-1}\right) = \sum _{n\geq 1} \text{Tr}(f^ n|_ M)T^ n

which holds for any commutative ring \Lambda and any endomorphism f of a finite projective \Lambda -module M. On the other hand, we have

\begin{align*} & T\frac{d}{dT} \log \left( \prod \nolimits _ i \det (1-\pi _ X^*T |_{H_ c^ i\left(X_{\bar k} , \mathcal{F}\right)})^{(-1)^{i+1}} \right) \\ & = \sum \nolimits _ i (-1)^ i \sum \nolimits _{n \geq 1} \text{Tr}\left((\pi _ X^ n)^* |_{H_ c^ i(X_{\bar k},\mathcal{F})}\right) T^ n \end{align*}

by the same formula again. Now, comparing powers of T and using the Mobius inversion formula, we see that Theorem 64.20.2 is a consequence of the following equality

\sum _{d | n} d \sum _{x \in |X| \atop \deg x = d} \text{Tr}((\pi _ X^{n/d})^* |_{\mathcal{F}_{\bar x}}) = \sum _ i (-1)^ i \text{Tr}((\pi ^ n_ X)^* |_{H^ i_ c(X_{\bar k}, \mathcal{F})}).

Writing k_ n for the degree n extension of k, X_ n = X \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}k} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k_ n) and _ n\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{F}|_{X_ n}, this boils down to

\sum _{x \in X_ n(k_ n)} \text{Tr}(\pi _ X^* |_{_ n\mathcal{F}_{\bar x}}) = \sum _ i (-1)^ i \text{Tr}((\pi ^ n_ X)^* |_{H^ i_ c({(X_ n)}_{\bar k}, _ n\mathcal{F})})

which is a consequence of Theorem 64.20.5.

Theorem 64.20.4. Let X/k be as above, let \Lambda be a finite ring with \# \Lambda \in k^* and K\in D_{ctf}(X, \Lambda ). Then R\Gamma _ c(X_{\bar k}, K)\in D_{perf}(\Lambda ) and

\sum _{x\in X(k)}\text{Tr}\left(\pi _ x |_{K_{\bar x}}\right) = \text{Tr}\left(\pi _ X^* |_{R\Gamma _ c(X_{\bar k}, K )}\right).

Proof. Note that we have already proved this (REFERENCE) when \dim X \leq 1. The general case follows easily from that case together with the proper base change theorem. \square

Theorem 64.20.5. Let X be a separated scheme of finite type over a finite field k and \mathcal{F} be a \mathbf{Q}_\ell -sheaf on X. Then \dim _{\mathbf{Q}_\ell }H_ c^ i(X_{\bar k}, \mathcal{F}) is finite for all i, and is nonzero for 0\leq i \leq 2 \dim X only. Furthermore, we have

\sum _{x\in X(k)} \text{Tr}\left(\pi _ x |_{\mathcal{F}_{\bar x}}\right) = \sum _ i (-1)^ i\text{Tr}\left(\pi _ X^* |_{H_ c^ i(X_{\bar k}, \mathcal{F})}\right).

Proof. We explain how to deduce this from Theorem 64.20.4. We first use some étale cohomology arguments to reduce the proof to an algebraic statement which we subsequently prove.

Let \mathcal{F} be as in the theorem. We can write \mathcal{F} as \mathcal{F}'\otimes \mathbf{Q}_\ell where \mathcal{F}' = \left\{ \mathcal{F}'_ n\right\} is a \mathbf{Z}_\ell -sheaf without torsion, i.e., \ell : \mathcal{F}'\to \mathcal{F}' has trivial kernel in the category of \mathbf{Z}_\ell -sheaves. Then each \mathcal{F}_ n' is a flat constructible \mathbf{Z}/\ell ^ n\mathbf{Z}-module on X_{\acute{e}tale}, so \mathcal{F}'_ n \in D_{ctf}(X, \mathbf{Z}/\ell ^ n\mathbf{Z}) and \mathcal{F}_{n+1}' \otimes ^{\mathbf{L}}_{\mathbf{Z}/\ell ^{n+1}\mathbf{Z}} \mathbf{Z}/\ell ^ n\mathbf{Z} = \mathcal{F}_ n'. Note that the last equality holds also for standard (non-derived) tensor product, since \mathcal{F}'_ n is flat (it is the same equality). Therefore,

  1. the complex K_ n = R\Gamma _ c\left(X_{\bar k}, \mathcal{F}_ n'\right) is perfect, and it is endowed with an endomorphism \pi _ n : K_ n\to K_ n in D(\mathbf{Z}/\ell ^ n\mathbf{Z}),

  2. there are identifications

    K_{n+1} \otimes ^{\mathbf{L}}_{\mathbf{Z}/\ell ^{n+1}\mathbf{Z}} \mathbf{Z}/\ell ^ n\mathbf{Z} = K_ n

    in D_{perf}(\mathbf{Z}/\ell ^ n\mathbf{Z}), compatible with the endomorphisms \pi _{n+1} and \pi _ n (see [Rapport 4.12, SGA4.5]),

  3. the equality \text{Tr}\left(\pi _ X^* |_{K_ n}\right) = \sum _{x\in X(k)} \text{Tr}\left(\pi _ x |_{(\mathcal{F}'_ n)_{\bar x}}\right) holds, and

  4. for each x\in X(k), the elements \text{Tr}(\pi _ x |_{\mathcal{F}'_{n, \bar x}}) \in \mathbf{Z}/\ell ^ n\mathbf{Z} form an element of \mathbf{Z}_\ell which is equal to \text{Tr}(\pi _ x |_{\mathcal{F}_{\bar x}}) \in \mathbf{Q}_\ell .

It thus suffices to prove the following algebra lemma. \square

Lemma 64.20.6. Suppose we have K_ n\in D_{perf}(\mathbf{Z}/\ell ^ n\mathbf{Z}), \pi _ n : K_ n\to K_ n and isomorphisms \varphi _ n : K_{n+1} \otimes ^\mathbf {L}_{\mathbf{Z}/\ell ^{n+1}\mathbf{Z}} \mathbf{Z}/\ell ^ n\mathbf{Z} \to K_ n compatible with \pi _{n+1} and \pi _ n. Then

  1. the elements t_ n = \text{Tr}(\pi _ n |_{K_ n})\in \mathbf{Z}/\ell ^ n\mathbf{Z} form an element t_\infty = \{ t_ n\} of \mathbf{Z}_\ell ,

  2. the \mathbf{Z}_\ell -module H_\infty ^ i = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ n H^ i(k_ n) is finite and is nonzero for finitely many i only, and

  3. the operators H^ i(\pi _ n): H^ i(K_ n)\to H^ i(K_ n) are compatible and define \pi _\infty ^ i : H_\infty ^ i\to H_\infty ^ i satisfying

    \sum (-1)^ i \text{Tr}( \pi _\infty ^ i |_{H_\infty ^ i \otimes _{\mathbf{Z}_\ell }\mathbf{Q}_\ell }) = t_\infty .

Proof. Since \mathbf{Z}/\ell ^ n\mathbf{Z} is a local ring and K_ n is perfect, each K_ n can be represented by a finite complex K_ n^\bullet of finite free \mathbf{Z}/\ell ^ n \mathbf{Z}-modules such that the map K_ n^ p \to K_ n^{p+1} has image contained in \ell K_ n^{p+1}. It is a fact that such a complex is unique up to isomorphism. Moreover \pi _ n can be represented by a morphism of complexes \pi _ n^\bullet : K_ n^\bullet \to K_ n^\bullet (which is unique up to homotopy). By the same token the isomorphism \varphi _ n : K_{n+1} \otimes _{\mathbf{Z}/\ell ^{n+1}\mathbf{Z}}^{\mathbf{L}} \mathbf{Z}/\ell ^ n\mathbf{Z}\to K_ n is represented by a map of complexes

\varphi _ n^\bullet : K_{n+1}^\bullet \otimes _{\mathbf{Z}/\ell ^{n+1}\mathbf{Z}} \mathbf{Z}/\ell ^ n\mathbf{Z} \to K_ n^\bullet .

In fact, \varphi _ n^\bullet is an isomorphism of complexes, thus we see that

  • there exist a, b\in \mathbf{Z} independent of n such that K_ n^ i = 0 for all i\notin [a, b], and

  • the rank of K_ n^ i is independent of n.

Therefore, the module K_\infty ^ i = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ n \{ K_ n^ i, \varphi _ n^ i\} is a finite free \mathbf{Z}_\ell -module and K_\infty ^\bullet is a finite complex of finite free \mathbf{Z}_\ell -modules. By induction on the number of nonzero terms, one can prove that H^ i\left(K_\infty ^\bullet \right) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ n H^ i\left(K_ n^\bullet \right) (this is not true for unbounded complexes). We conclude that H_\infty ^ i = H^ i\left(K_\infty ^\bullet \right) is a finite \mathbf{Z}_\ell -module. This proves ii. To prove the remainder of the lemma, we need to overcome the possible noncommutativity of the diagrams

\xymatrix{ {K_{n+1}^\bullet } \ar[d]_{\pi _{n+1}^\bullet } \ar[r]^{\varphi _ n^\bullet } & {K_ n^\bullet } \ar[d]^{\pi _ n^\bullet } \\ {K_{n+1}^\bullet } \ar[r]_{\varphi _ n^\bullet } & {K_ n^\bullet .} }

However, this diagram does commute in the derived category, hence it commutes up to homotopy. We inductively replace \pi _ n^\bullet for n\geq 2 by homotopic maps of complexes making these diagrams commute. Namely, if h^ i : K_{n+1}^ i \to K_ n^{i-1} is a homotopy, i.e.,

\pi _ n^\bullet \circ \varphi _ n^\bullet - \varphi _ n^\bullet \circ \pi _{n + 1}^\bullet = dh + hd,

then we choose \tilde h^ i : K_{n+1}^ i\to K_{n+1}^{i-1} lifting h^ i. This is possible because K_{n+1}^ i free and K_{n+1}^{i-1}\to K_ n^{i-1} is surjective. Then replace \pi _ n^\bullet by \tilde\pi _ n^\bullet defined by

\tilde\pi _{n+1}^\bullet = \pi _{n+1}^\bullet + d\tilde h+\tilde hd.

With this choice of \{ \pi _ n^\bullet \} , the above diagrams commute, and the maps fit together to define an endomorphism \pi _\infty ^\bullet = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ n\pi _ n^\bullet of K_\infty ^\bullet . Then part i is clear: the elements t_ n = \sum (-1)^ i \text{Tr}\left(\pi _ n^ i |_{K_ n^ i}\right) fit into an element t_\infty of \mathbf{Z}_\ell . Moreover

\begin{align*} t_\infty & = \sum (-1)^ i \text{Tr}_{\mathbf{Z}_\ell }(\pi _\infty ^ i |_{K_\infty ^ i}) \\ & = \sum (-1)^ i \text{Tr}_{\mathbf{Q}_\ell }( \pi _\infty ^ i |_{K_\infty ^ i \otimes _{\mathbf{Z}_\ell }\mathbf{Q}_\ell }) \\ & = \sum (-1)^ i \text{Tr}( \pi _\infty |_{H^ i(K_\infty ^\bullet \otimes \mathbf{Q}_\ell )}) \end{align*}

where the last equality follows from the fact that \mathbf{Q}_\ell is a field, so the complex K_\infty ^\bullet \otimes \mathbf{Q}_\ell is quasi-isomorphic to its cohomology H^ i(K_\infty ^\bullet \otimes \mathbf{Q}_\ell ). The latter is also equal to H^ i(K_\infty ^\bullet )\otimes _{\mathbf{Z}}\mathbf{Q}_\ell = H_\infty ^ i \otimes \mathbf{Q}_\ell , which finishes the proof of the lemma, and also that of Theorem 64.20.5. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #2441 by sdf on

The reference has not been filled in in Definition 50.97.4 but I am not sure what it should point to. The reference in (2) of the numbered list in the proof of Theorem 50.98.5 is broken.

Comment #2484 by on

OK, I am very sorry, but this has to be fixed by very carefully rewriting all the material leading up to this section. I do think it still gives you an idea of the steps one has to do to prove the thing...


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.