Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 33.24.1. Let k be a field. Let X, Y be schemes over k, and let A \subset X, B \subset Y be subsets. Set

AB = \{ z \in X \times _ k Y \mid \text{pr}_ X(z) \in A, \ \text{pr}_ Y(z) \in B\} \subset X \times _ k Y

Then set theoretically we have

\overline{A} \times _ k \overline{B} = \overline{AB}

Proof. The inclusion \overline{AB} \subset \overline{A} \times _ k \overline{B} is immediate. We may replace X and Y by the reduced closed subschemes \overline{A} and \overline{B}. Let W \subset X \times _ k Y be a nonempty open subset. By Morphisms, Lemma 29.23.4 the subset U = \text{pr}_ X(W) is nonempty open in X. Hence A \cap U is nonempty. Pick a \in A \cap U. Denote Y_{\kappa (a)} = \{ a\} \times _ k Y the fibre of \text{pr}_ X : X \times _ k Y \to X over a. By Morphisms, Lemma 29.23.4 again the morphism Y_ a \to Y is open as \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (a)) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) is universally open. Hence the nonempty open subset W_ a = W \times _{X \times _ k Y} Y_ a maps to a nonempty open subset of Y. We conclude there exists a b \in B in the image. Hence AB \cap W \not= \emptyset as desired. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 33.24: Closures of products

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.