The Stacks project

Lemma 41.17.3. Let $f : X \to S$ be a finite unramified morphism of schemes. Let $s \in S$. There exists an étale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$ and a finite disjoint union decomposition

\[ X_ U = \coprod \nolimits _ j V_ j \]

such that each $V_ j \to U$ is a closed immersion.

Proof. Since $X \to S$ is finite the fibre over $s$ is a finite set $\{ x_1, \ldots , x_ n\} $ of points of $X$. Apply Lemma 41.17.2 to this set (a finite morphism is separated, see Morphisms, Section 29.44). The image of $W$ in $U$ is a closed subset (as $X_ U \to U$ is finite, hence proper) which does not contain $u$. After removing this from $U$ we see that $W = \emptyset $ as desired. $\square$

Comments (3)

Comment #4018 by Davide Lombardo on

Small typo: "the fibre over ", not over , I guess.

Comment #4021 by Laurent Moret-Bailly on

Of course this is trivial, but I believe the statement should say that the sum is finite.

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 41.17: Étale local structure of unramified morphisms

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 04HJ. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.