changed the proof
|
2024-06-17 |
0930990 |
fix small typos
|
changed the proof
|
2020-06-16 |
83de880 |
Typo in etale-cohomology
THanks to Matthieu Rommagny
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/04I7#comment-5017
|
changed the proof
|
2013-08-03 |
badd58f |
Spell check: words starting with b, c, B, or C
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2013-05-24 |
719c185 |
LaTeX: \etale
Introduced the macro
\def\etale{{\acute{e}tale}}
and replaced all occurences of \acute{e}tale by \etale
|
changed the proof
|
2011-08-13 |
4ea0b65 |
Whitespace changes
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2011-08-11 |
f2e3127 |
LaTeX: \Sh
Introduced the macro
\def\Sh{\mathop{\textit{Sh}}\nolimits}
and replaced all occurences of \textit{Sh} with \Sh.
|
changed the statement
|
2011-08-11 |
f496b59 |
LaTeX: \Sch
Introduced a new macro
\def\Sch{\textit{Sch}}
and replaced all the occurences of \textit{Sch} with \Sch.
|
changed the statement
|
2010-10-09 |
de2ddd0 |
Neurotic changes
Fix (almost all) complaints of parse.py
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2010-10-09 |
97a5c76 |
Begin translating etale to \'etale or \acute{e}tale (in Math mode).
|
changed the proof
|
2010-05-13 |
5cce961 |
Uniqueness of recovering morphisms
In Etale Cohomology and in Properties of Spaces we added lemmas
stating that if a, b : X ---> Y are morphisms of schemes or
algebraic spaces and if the associated morphisms of ringed topoi
are isomorphic then a = b. This trivial result is made difficult
to prove only because it is so damn confusing to work out
exactly what it means!
|
changed the proof
|
2010-05-12 |
e7ae4f0 |
Relocalizing morphisms of (ringed) topoi
There is quite a bit of duplication here, but it seems
convenient to be able to talk about this both when given
explicit sites defining the topoi and when you are just given an
abstract morphism of (ringed) topoi.
|
changed the proof
|
2010-04-21 |
f748a4c |
Etale Cohomology: Functoriality etale topoi done
This commit puts in the last bits for the proof that a morphism
of locally ringed topoi
(X_{etale}, O_X) ---> (Y_{etale}, O_Y)
always comes from a morphism of schemes X ---> Y.
The current proof by glueing is not really that nice since it
requires a lot of sophistication from the reader. On the other
hand it is more or less clear that you can do this as soon as
you start thinking about it, and in fact it is probably the
proof that a less sophisticated mathematicien (such as me) would
come up with in the first place. Hah!
|
changed the proof
|
2010-04-20 |
55b1111 |
Modules on Sites: Localization of morphisms of locally ringed topoi
Arrggghhhh! Oh well, it is very nice how it all fits together.
|
assigned tag 04I7
|
2010-04-19 |
12d45c1
|
Tags: added new tags
|
changed the proof
|
2010-04-19 |
71fd7e3 |
Sites: Localizing morphisms of topoi
Realized this was missing whilst working out details on
functoriality of small etale topoi.
|
created statement with label theorem-fully-faithful in etale-cohomology.tex
|
2010-04-19 |
37deb9b |
Etale Cohomology: Functoriality small etale sites
Almost done with this.
|