History of tag 04KL
Go back to the tag's page.
type |
time |
link |
changed the statement and the proof
|
2013-05-24 |
719c185 |
LaTeX: \etale
Introduced the macro
\def\etale{{\acute{e}tale}}
and replaced all occurences of \acute{e}tale by \etale
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2011-08-11 |
f2e3127 |
LaTeX: \Sh
Introduced the macro
\def\Sh{\mathop{\textit{Sh}}\nolimits}
and replaced all occurences of \textit{Sh} with \Sh.
|
changed the proof
|
2011-08-11 |
4c15ebf |
LaTeX: \Ob
Introduced a macro
\def\Ob{\mathop{\rm Ob}\nolimits}
and replaced any occurence of \text{Ob}( with \Ob(. There are
still some occurences of \text{Ob} but these are sets, not the
operator that takes the set of objects of a category.
|
changed the statement
|
2011-08-10 |
65ce54f |
LaTeX: \Spec
Introduced the macro
\def\Spec{\mathop{\rm Spec}}
and changed all the occurences of \text{Spec} into \Spec.
|
changed the statement
|
2011-03-30 |
220a4cc |
More on thickenings of spaces
Elementary, my dear Watson!
|
changed the proof
|
2010-10-09 |
de2ddd0 |
Neurotic changes
Fix (almost all) complaints of parse.py
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2010-10-09 |
2b090dd |
End conversion of etale to \'etale.
|
changed the proof
|
2010-05-14 |
4890dc3 |
Properties of Spaces: Fully faithfulness done
Finally done proving that morphisms of algebraic spaces are the
same thing as morphisms between their associated locally ringed
etale topoi.
|
changed the statement
|
2010-05-13 |
5cce961 |
Uniqueness of recovering morphisms
In Etale Cohomology and in Properties of Spaces we added lemmas
stating that if a, b : X ---> Y are morphisms of schemes or
algebraic spaces and if the associated morphisms of ringed topoi
are isomorphic then a = b. This trivial result is made difficult
to prove only because it is so damn confusing to work out
exactly what it means!
|
assigned tag 04KL
|
2010-05-12 |
44f445f
|
Tags: New tags added
|
changed the proof
|
2010-05-12 |
e7ae4f0 |
Relocalizing morphisms of (ringed) topoi
There is quite a bit of duplication here, but it seems
convenient to be able to talk about this both when given
explicit sites defining the topoi and when you are just given an
abstract morphism of (ringed) topoi.
|
created statement with label theorem-fully-faithful in spaces-properties.tex
|
2010-05-07 |
ed349f6 |
Properties of Spaces: Recovering morphisms
|