Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

95.14.5 Principal homogeneous spaces

Let B be an algebraic space over S. Let G be a group algebraic space over B. We define a category G\textit{-Principal} as follows:

  1. An object of G\textit{-Principal} is a triple (U, b, X) where

    1. U is an object of (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf},

    2. b : U \to B is a morphism over S, and

    3. X is a principal homogeneous G_ U-space over U where G_ U = U \times _{b, B} G.

    See Groupoids in Spaces, Definition 78.9.3.

  2. A morphism (U, b, X) \to (U', b', X') is given by a pair (f, g), where f : U \to U' is a morphism of schemes over B, and g : X \to U \times _{f, U'} X' is an isomorphism of principal homogeneous G_ U-spaces.

Thus G\textit{-Principal} is a category and

p : G\textit{-Principal} \longrightarrow (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}, \quad (U, b, X) \longmapsto U

is a functor. Note that the fibre category of G\textit{-Principal} over U is the disjoint union over b : U \to B of the categories of principal homogeneous U \times _{b, B} G-spaces, hence is a groupoid.

In the special case S = B the objects are simply pairs (U, X) where U is a scheme over S, and X is a principal homogeneous G_ U-space over U. Moreover, morphisms are simply cartesian diagrams

\xymatrix{ X \ar[d] \ar[r]_ g & X' \ar[d] \\ U \ar[r]^ f & U' }

where g is G-equivariant.

Remark 95.14.6. We conjecture that up to a replacement as in Stacks, Remark 8.4.9 the functor

p : G\textit{-Principal} \longrightarrow (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}

defines a stack in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. This would follow if one could show that given

  1. a covering \{ U_ i \to U\} _{i \in I} of (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf},

  2. an group algebraic space H over U,

  3. for every i a principal homogeneous H_{U_ i}-space X_ i over U_ i, and

  4. H-equivariant isomorphisms \varphi _{ij} : X_{i, U_ i \times _ U U_ j} \to X_{j, U_ i \times _ U U_ j} satisfying the cocycle condition,

there exists a principal homogeneous H-space X over U which recovers (X_ i, \varphi _{ij}). The technique of the proof of Bootstrap, Lemma 80.11.8 reduces this to a set theoretical question, so the reader who ignores set theoretical questions will “know” that the result is true. In https://math.columbia.edu/~dejong/wordpress/?p=591 there is a suggestion as to how to approach this problem.


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.