Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 95.16.1. Up to a replacement as in Stacks, Remark 8.4.9 the functor

\mathcal{P}\! \mathit{ic}_{X/B} \longrightarrow (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}

defines a stack in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}.

Proof. As usual, the hardest part is to show descent for objects. To see this let \{ U_ i \to U\} be a covering of (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. Let \xi _ i = (U_ i, b_ i, \mathcal{L}_ i) be an object of \mathcal{P}\! \mathit{ic}_{X/B} lying over U_ i, and let \varphi _{ij} : \text{pr}_0^*\xi _ i \to \text{pr}_1^*\xi _ j be a descent datum. This implies in particular that the morphisms b_ i are the restrictions of a morphism b : U \to B. Write X_ U = U \times _{b, B} X and X_ i = U_ i \times _{b_ i, B} X = U_ i \times _ U U \times _{b, B} X = U_ i \times _ U X_ U. Observe that \mathcal{L}_ i is an invertible \mathcal{O}_{X_ i}-module. Note that \{ X_ i \to X_ U\} forms an fppf covering as well. Moreover, the descent datum \varphi _{ij} translates into a descent datum on the invertible sheaves \mathcal{L}_ i relative to the fppf covering \{ X_ i \to X_ U\} . Hence by Descent on Spaces, Proposition 74.4.1 we obtain a unique invertible sheaf \mathcal{L} on X_ U which recovers \mathcal{L}_ i and the descent data over X_ i. The triple (U, b, \mathcal{L}) is therefore the object of \mathcal{P}\! \mathit{ic}_{X/B} over U we were looking for. Details omitted. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 1 comment(s) on Section 95.16: The Picard stack

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.