Lemma 95.16.1. Up to a replacement as in Stacks, Remark 8.4.9 the functor
defines a stack in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}.
Lemma 95.16.1. Up to a replacement as in Stacks, Remark 8.4.9 the functor
defines a stack in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}.
Proof. As usual, the hardest part is to show descent for objects. To see this let \{ U_ i \to U\} be a covering of (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. Let \xi _ i = (U_ i, b_ i, \mathcal{L}_ i) be an object of \mathcal{P}\! \mathit{ic}_{X/B} lying over U_ i, and let \varphi _{ij} : \text{pr}_0^*\xi _ i \to \text{pr}_1^*\xi _ j be a descent datum. This implies in particular that the morphisms b_ i are the restrictions of a morphism b : U \to B. Write X_ U = U \times _{b, B} X and X_ i = U_ i \times _{b_ i, B} X = U_ i \times _ U U \times _{b, B} X = U_ i \times _ U X_ U. Observe that \mathcal{L}_ i is an invertible \mathcal{O}_{X_ i}-module. Note that \{ X_ i \to X_ U\} forms an fppf covering as well. Moreover, the descent datum \varphi _{ij} translates into a descent datum on the invertible sheaves \mathcal{L}_ i relative to the fppf covering \{ X_ i \to X_ U\} . Hence by Descent on Spaces, Proposition 74.4.1 we obtain a unique invertible sheaf \mathcal{L} on X_ U which recovers \mathcal{L}_ i and the descent data over X_ i. The triple (U, b, \mathcal{L}) is therefore the object of \mathcal{P}\! \mathit{ic}_{X/B} over U we were looking for. Details omitted. \square
Comments (0)
There are also: