Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 10.115.1. Let n \in \mathbf{N}. Let N be a finite nonempty set of multi-indices \nu = (\nu _1, \ldots , \nu _ n). Given e = (e_1, \ldots , e_ n) we set e \cdot \nu = \sum e_ i\nu _ i. Then for e_1 \gg e_2 \gg \ldots \gg e_{n-1} \gg e_ n we have: If \nu , \nu ' \in N then

(e \cdot \nu = e \cdot \nu ') \Leftrightarrow (\nu = \nu ')

Proof. Say N = \{ \nu _ j\} with \nu _ j = (\nu _{j1}, \ldots , \nu _{jn}). Let A_ i = \max _ j \nu _{ji} - \min _ j \nu _{ji}. If for each i we have e_{i - 1} > A_ ie_ i + A_{i + 1}e_{i + 1} + \ldots + A_ ne_ n then the lemma holds. For suppose that e \cdot (\nu - \nu ') = 0. Then for n \ge 2,

e_1(\nu _1 - \nu '_1) = \sum \nolimits _{i = 2}^ n e_ i(\nu '_ i - \nu _ i).

We may assume that (\nu _1 - \nu '_1) \ge 0. If (\nu _1 - \nu '_1) > 0, then

e_1(\nu _1 - \nu '_1) \ge e_1 > A_2e_2 + \ldots + A_ ne_ n \ge \sum \nolimits _{i = 2}^ n e_ i|\nu '_ i - \nu _ i| \ge \sum \nolimits _{i = 2}^ n e_ i(\nu '_ i - \nu _ i).

This contradiction implies that \nu '_1 = \nu _1. By induction, \nu '_ i = \nu _ i for 2 \le i \le n. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #2830 by Dario Weißmann on

Typo in the proof: "For suppose that ... " should read "Suppose that ... "

Comment #2929 by on

Google:"For I will consider my Cat Jeoffry."

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 10.115: Noether normalization

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.