Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Proof. A colimit of a directed system of flat modules is flat, as taking directed colimits is exact and commutes with tensor product. Hence if M is the colimit of a directed system of free finite modules then M is flat.

For the converse, first recall that any module M can be written as the colimit of a directed system of finitely presented modules, in the following way. Choose a surjection f: R^ I \to M for some set I, and let K be the kernel. Let E be the set of ordered pairs (J, N) where J is a finite subset of I and N is a finitely generated submodule of R^ J \cap K. Then E is made into a directed partially ordered set by defining (J, N) \leq (J', N') if and only if J \subset J' and N \subset N'. Define M_ e = R^ J/N for e = (J, N), and define f_{ee'}: M_ e \to M_{e'} to be the natural map for e \leq e'. Then (M_ e, f_{ee'}) is a directed system and the natural maps f_ e: M_ e \to M induce an isomorphism \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{e \in E} M_ e \xrightarrow {\cong } M.

Now suppose M is flat. Let I = M \times \mathbf{Z}, write (x_ i) for the canonical basis of R^{I}, and take in the above discussion f: R^ I \to M to be the map sending x_ i to the projection of i onto M. To prove the theorem it suffices to show that the e \in E such that M_ e is free form a cofinal subset of E. So let e = (J, N) \in E be arbitrary. By Lemma 10.81.2 there is a free finite module F and maps h: R^ J/N \to F and g: F \to M such that the natural map f_ e: R^ J/N \to M factors as R^ J/N \xrightarrow {h} F \xrightarrow {g} M. We are going to realize F as M_{e'} for some e' \geq e.

Let \{ b_1, \ldots , b_ n \} be a finite basis of F. Choose n distinct elements i_1, \ldots , i_ n \in I such that i_{\ell } \notin J for all \ell , and such that the image of x_{i_{\ell }} under f: R^ I \to M equals the image of b_{\ell } under g: F \to M. This is possible since every element of M can be written as f(x_ i) for infinitely many distinct i \in I (by our choice of I). Now let J' = J \cup \{ i_1, \ldots , i_ n \} , and define R^{J'} \to F by x_ i \mapsto h(x_ i) for i \in J and x_{i_{\ell }} \mapsto b_{\ell } for \ell = 1, \ldots , n. Let N' = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(R^{J'} \to F). Observe:

  1. The square

    \xymatrix{ R^{J'} \ar[r] \ar@{^{(}->}[d] & F \ar[d]^{g} \\ R^{I} \ar[r]_{f} & M }

    is commutative, hence N' \subset K = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(f);

  2. R^{J'} \to F is a surjection onto a free finite module, hence it splits and so N' is finitely generated;

  3. J \subset J' and N \subset N'.

By (1) and (2) e' = (J', N') is in E, by (3) e' \geq e, and by construction M_{e'} = R^{J'}/N' \cong F is free. \square


Comments (1)

Comment #5032 by Laurent Moret-Bailly on

In the proof, apparently denotes , while it usually means . Is this standard SP notation?


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.