Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

The Stacks project

History of tag 05FV

Go back to the tag's page.

type time link
changed the proof 2012-05-10 3f35f36
zerodivisor and nonzerodivisor

	Seems better this way.
changed the statement and the proof 2010-12-07 0b19c63
More examples of pure modules

	In particular it turns out that if we have R ---> S and N an
	S-module which is countably generated and Mittag-Leffler as an
	R-module, then it is pure relative to S/R. This finally puts a
	direct link between purity and the Mittag-Leffler condition
	which I was looking for.

	Note that there is an example that shows that one cannot go the
	other way. Namely, there exist pure modules over S/R (even when
	everything of finite type and Noetherian) which are not
	Mittag-Leffler.
changed the statement 2010-12-04 262ac78
Simplification

	Remove unnecessary hypothesis.
changed the statement 2010-11-27 47011a9
Fix an example

	Actually the example was correct but the thing it was a counter
	example against was formulated incorrectly. Now we added it as
	an actual lemma in more-morphisms.tex
assigned tag 05FV 2010-10-23 ae2a311
Tags: Added new tags
created statement with label lemma-explain-why-pure in flat.tex 2010-10-20 7f432aa
Explain purity

	We added the following fun lemma: Suppose R ---> S is a ring map
	with R local and M an R-module. Assume that
		S/m_RS is Noetherian
		M/m_RM is finite over S/m_RS
		M is projective as an R-module
	Then any prime q of S which is an associated prime of M \otimes
	k(p) where p = q \cap R is contained in a prime of S lying over
	m_R. This lemma in some sense explains the notion of purity
	introduced in Raynaud-Gruson...