The Stacks project

Lemma 26.19.7. Let $f : X \to S$ be a quasi-compact morphism of schemes. The following are equivalent

  1. $f(X) \subset S$ is closed, and

  2. $f(X) \subset S$ is stable under specialization.

Proof. We have (1) $\Rightarrow $ (2) by Topology, Lemma 5.19.2. Assume (2). Let $U \subset S$ be an affine open. It suffices to prove that $f(X) \cap U$ is closed. Since $U \cap f(X)$ is stable under specializations in $U$, we have reduced to the case where $S$ is affine. Because $f$ is quasi-compact we deduce that $X = f^{-1}(S)$ is quasi-compact as $S$ is affine. Thus we may write $X = \bigcup _{i = 1}^ n U_ i$ with $U_ i \subset X$ open affine. Say $S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ and $U_ i = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_ i)$ for some $R$-algebra $A_ i$. Then $f(X) = \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_1 \times \ldots \times A_ n) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R))$. Thus the lemma follows from Algebra, Lemma 10.41.5. $\square$


Comments (2)

Comment #3070 by Dario WeiƟmann on

The property "closed under specialization" is relative to the ambient space. In the proof is closed under specialization in . This confused me for a second, maybe this could be clarified?

There are also:

  • 8 comment(s) on Section 26.19: Quasi-compact morphisms

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 05JL. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.