Lemma 15.30.2. Let $R$ be a ring, $M$ an $R$-module, and $f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in R$ such that for $i = 1, \ldots , r$ multiplication by $f_ i$ is injective on $M/(f_1, \ldots , f_{i - 1})M$. Then $f_1, \ldots , f_ r$ is $M$-Koszul regular. In particular, an $M$-regular sequence is $M$-Koszul-regular and any regular sequence is Koszul-regular.
Proof. Let $R$, $M$, $f_1, \ldots , f_ r$ be as in the first sentence of the lemma. If $r = 1$, it is immediate that $f_1$ is $M$-Koszul-regular. Assume $r > 1$. Since $f_1$ is a nonzerodivisor on $M$, we obtain a short exact sequence of complexes:
Here $\overline{f}_ i$ is the image of $f_ i$ in $R/(f_1)$. By Lemma 15.28.8 the complex $K_\bullet (f_1, \ldots , f_ r)$ is isomorphic to the cone of multiplication by $f_1$ on $K_\bullet (f_2, \ldots , f_ r)$. Thus $K_\bullet (R, f_1, \ldots , f_ r) \otimes M$ is isomorphic to the cone on the first map. Hence $K_\bullet (\overline{f}_2, \ldots , \overline{f}_ r) \otimes M/f_1M$ is quasi-isomorphic to $K_\bullet (f_1, \ldots , f_ r) \otimes M$. As $R/(f_1)$, $M/f_1M$, $\overline{f}_2, \ldots , \overline{f}_ r$ satisfy the conditions of the lemma, by induction we conclude this complex is acyclic in postive degrees. This finishes the proof of the first statement. The second statement immediately follows from the first. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (2)
Comment #5755 by Kestutis Cesnavicius on
Comment #5765 by Johan on
There are also: