The Stacks project

Proof. Let $R$ be a ring and let $M$ be an $R$-module. Let $f_1, \ldots , f_ r$ be an $M$-$H_1$-regular sequence. Denote $J = (f_1, \ldots , f_ r)$. The assumption means that we have an exact sequence

\[ \wedge ^2(R^ r) \otimes M \to R^{\oplus r} \otimes M \to JM \to 0 \]

where the first arrow is given by $e_ i \wedge e_ j \otimes m \mapsto (f_ ie_ j - f_ je_ i) \otimes m$. In particular this implies that

\[ JM/J^2M = JM \otimes _ R R/J = (M/JM)^{\oplus r} \]

is a finite free module. To finish the proof we have to prove for every $n \geq 2$ the following: if

\[ \xi = \sum \nolimits _{|I| = n, I = (i_1, \ldots , i_ r)} m_ I f_1^{i_1} \ldots f_ r^{i_ r} \in J^{n + 1}M \]

then $m_ I \in JM$ for all $I$. Note that $f_1, \ldots , f_{r - 1}, f_ r^ n$ is an $M$-$H_1$-regular sequence by Lemma 15.30.4. Hence we see that the required result holds for the multi-index $I = (0, \ldots , 0, n)$. It turns out that we can reduce the general case to this case as follows.

Let $S = R[x_1, x_2, \ldots , x_ r, 1/x_ r]$. The ring map $R \to S$ is faithfully flat, hence $f_1, \ldots , f_ r$ is an $M$-$H_1$-regular sequence in $S$, see Lemma 15.30.5. By Lemma 15.28.4 we see that

\[ g_1 = f_1 - x_1/x_ r f_ r, \ldots g_{r - 1} = f_{r - 1} - x_{r - 1}/x_ r f_ r, g_ r = (1/x_ r)f_ r \]

is an $M$-$H_1$-regular sequence in $S$. Finally, note that our element $\xi $ can be rewritten

\[ \xi = \sum \nolimits _{|I| = n, I = (i_1, \ldots , i_ r)} m_ I (g_1 + x_ r g_ r)^{i_1} \ldots (g_{r - 1} + x_ r g_ r)^{i_{r - 1}} (x_ rg_ r)^{i_ r} \]

and the coefficient of $g_ r^ n$ in this expression is

\[ \sum m_ I x_1^{i_1} \ldots x_ r^{i_ r} \in J(M \otimes _ R S). \]

Since the monomials $x_1^{i_1} \ldots x_ r^{i_ r}$ form part of an $R$-basis of $S$ over $R$ we conclude that $m_ I \in J$ for all $I$ as desired. $\square$


Comments (1)

Comment #6253 by on

The question asked was: why do we have for ? Well, we can write and we know it is in so we can also write . Then we see that By definition of -regular we see that is in the submodule . OK? I could not see how this implies the same for the other coefficients, because I don't know how to do the same algebra trick for the other coefficients.

I shall add some text to the proof the next time I go through all the comments.

There are also:

  • 4 comment(s) on Section 15.30: Koszul regular sequences

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 062I. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.