Lemma 15.64.9. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $m \in \mathbf{Z}$. Let $K^\bullet$ be a bounded above complex of $R$-modules such that $K^ i$ is $(m - i)$-pseudo-coherent for all $i$. Then $K^\bullet$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent. In particular, if $K^\bullet$ is a bounded above complex of pseudo-coherent $R$-modules, then $K^\bullet$ is pseudo-coherent.

Proof. We may replace $K^\bullet$ by $\sigma _{\geq m - 1}K^\bullet$ (for example) and hence assume that $K^\bullet$ is bounded. Then the complex $K^\bullet$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent as each $K^ i[-i]$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent by induction on the length of the complex: use Lemma 15.64.2 and the stupid truncations. For the final statement, it suffices to prove that $K^\bullet$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent for all $m \in \mathbf{Z}$, see Lemma 15.64.5. This follows from the first part. $\square$

## Comments (0)

There are also:

• 7 comment(s) on Section 15.64: Pseudo-coherent modules, I

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 064Y. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.