Lemma 15.65.14. Let R be a ring. Let f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in R be elements which generate the unit ideal. Let m \in \mathbf{Z}. Let K^\bullet be a complex of R-modules. If for each i the complex K^\bullet \otimes _ R R_{f_ i} is m-pseudo-coherent (resp. pseudo-coherent), then K^\bullet is m-pseudo-coherent (resp. pseudo-coherent).
Proof. We will use without further mention that - \otimes _ R R_{f_ i} is an exact functor and that therefore
Assume K^\bullet \otimes _ R R_{f_ i} is m-pseudo-coherent for i = 1, \ldots , r. Let n \in \mathbf{Z} be the largest integer such that H^ n(K^\bullet \otimes _ R R_{f_ i}) is nonzero for some i. This implies in particular that H^ i(K^\bullet ) = 0 for i > n (and that H^ n(K^\bullet ) \not= 0) see Algebra, Lemma 10.23.2. We will prove the lemma by induction on n - m. If n < m, then the lemma is true by Lemma 15.65.7. If n \geq m, then H^ n(K^\bullet )_{f_ i} is a finite R_{f_ i}-module for each i, see Lemma 15.65.3. Hence H^ n(K^\bullet ) is a finite R-module, see Algebra, Lemma 10.23.2. Choose a finite free R-module E and a surjection E \to H^ n(K^\bullet ). As E is projective we can lift this to a map of complexes \alpha : E[-n] \to K^\bullet . Then the cone C(\alpha )^\bullet has vanishing cohomology in degrees \geq n. On the other hand, the complexes C(\alpha )^\bullet \otimes _ R R_{f_ i} are m-pseudo-coherent for each i, see Lemma 15.65.2. Hence by induction we see that C(\alpha )^\bullet is m-pseudo-coherent as a complex of R-modules. Applying Lemma 15.65.2 once more we conclude. \square
Comments (0)
There are also: