Proof.
Assume (2). Let k be a field and let y be an object of \mathcal{Y} over k. Let X_ y denote an algebraic space over k representing the 2-fibre product
(\mathit{Sch}/\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k))_{fppf} \times _{y, \mathcal{Y}, p} \mathcal{X}.
As we've assumed that p is surjective we see that X_ y is not empty. Hence we can find a field extension K/k and a K-valued point x of X_ y. Via the 2-Yoneda lemma this corresponds to an object x of \mathcal{X} over K together with an isomorphism p(x) \cong y|_{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K)} and we see that (1) holds.
Assume (1). Choose a scheme T and a 1-morphism y : (\mathit{Sch}/T)_{fppf} \to \mathcal{Y}. Let X_ y be an algebraic space over T representing the 2-fibre product (\mathit{Sch}/T)_{fppf} \times _{y, \mathcal{Y}, p} \mathcal{X}. We have to show that X_ y \to T is surjective. By Morphisms of Spaces, Definition 67.5.2 we have to show that |X_ y| \to |T| is surjective. This means exactly that given a field k over T and a morphism t : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to T there exists a field extension K/k and a morphism x : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \to X_ y such that
\xymatrix{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \ar[d] \ar[r]_ x & X_ y \ar[d] \\ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \ar[r]^ t & T }
commutes. By the 2-Yoneda lemma this means exactly that we have to find k \subset K and an object x of \mathcal{X} over K such that p(x) \cong t^*y|_{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K)}. Hence (1) guarantees that this is the case and we win.
\square
Comments (0)