changed the proof
|
2024-06-17 |
0930990 |
fix small typos
|
changed the statement
|
2017-07-01 |
b777e73 |
Yet another criterion smoothness in formal-defos
|
changed the proof
|
2017-06-19 |
eeec4a5 |
Characterize unobstructed predeformation category
in terms of versal formal object
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2017-06-18 |
2011f16 |
Better notation for deformation problems
|
changed the proof
|
2013-08-20 |
f14903c |
Nothing to see here: controlling paragraphs neurotically
|
changed the proof
|
2012-10-07 |
2fef368 |
Corrected unsubstantial typos.
|
changed the label to lemma-deformation-categories-fiber-product-morphisms
|
2012-06-22 |
b40a0c4 |
First version of Artin's theorems
This monster commit contains the first version of Artin's
theorems on representability of stacks and spaces. It is still a
bit rough.
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2012-06-22 |
b40a0c4 |
First version of Artin's theorems
This monster commit contains the first version of Artin's
theorems on representability of stacks and spaces. It is still a
bit rough.
|
changed the statement
|
2011-08-13 |
4ea0b65 |
Whitespace changes
|
changed the statement
|
2011-08-11 |
1b77f34 |
LaTeX: Hom and SheafHom
Introduced the macros
\def\Hom{\mathop{\rm Hom}\nolimits}
\def\SheafHom{\mathop{\mathcal{H}\!{\it om}}\nolimits}
and replaced all the occurences of \text{Hom} and \textit{Hom}
with these.
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2011-06-30 |
af276e6 |
Existence of smooth presentations
Yeah!
|
changed the statement
|
2011-06-24 |
7ab110e |
Schlessinger's conditions
I changed the condition (S2) because for non predeformation
categories the condition just wasn't the right one (as far as I
can tell). This has already been a bit of a bore, but hopefully
it will not be too bad. In particular, if F is a predeformation
category then the new condition is equivalent to the old
condition...
|
changed the statement
|
2011-06-23 |
a6df7f9 |
Cofibered in groupoids
Formal section with only category theory.
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2011-06-23 |
5dd8964 |
The category C_\Lambda
This turned out to be quite a bit more interesting than I had
at first imagined. Can you do this without appealing to the
naive cotangent complex? I am sure you can, but how much longer
would it be...? Patches welcome.
|
assigned tag 06L5
|
2011-06-01 |
95db5d6
|
Tags: Added new tags
Due to the new material in the chapter on deformation theory.
|
created statement with label lemma-deformation-functor-fiber-product-morphisms in formal-defos.tex
|
2011-06-01 |
ae2f687 |
New chapter on formal deformation theory
Written by Alex Perry.
|