Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

The Stacks project

History of tag 06L5

Go back to the tag's page.

type time link
changed the proof 2024-06-17 0930990
fix small typos
changed the statement 2017-07-01 b777e73
Yet another criterion smoothness in formal-defos
changed the proof 2017-06-19 eeec4a5
Characterize unobstructed predeformation category

in terms of versal formal object
changed the statement and the proof 2017-06-18 2011f16
Better notation for deformation problems
changed the proof 2013-08-20 f14903c
Nothing to see here: controlling paragraphs neurotically
changed the proof 2012-10-07 2fef368
Corrected unsubstantial typos.
changed the label to lemma-deformation-categories-fiber-product-morphisms 2012-06-22 b40a0c4
First version of Artin's theorems

	This monster commit contains the first version of Artin's
	theorems on representability of stacks and spaces. It is still a
	bit rough.
changed the statement and the proof 2012-06-22 b40a0c4
First version of Artin's theorems

	This monster commit contains the first version of Artin's
	theorems on representability of stacks and spaces. It is still a
	bit rough.
changed the statement 2011-08-13 4ea0b65
Whitespace changes
changed the statement 2011-08-11 1b77f34
LaTeX: Hom and SheafHom

	Introduced the macros

	\def\Hom{\mathop{\rm Hom}\nolimits}
	\def\SheafHom{\mathop{\mathcal{H}\!{\it om}}\nolimits}

	and replaced all the occurences of \text{Hom} and \textit{Hom}
	with these.
changed the statement and the proof 2011-06-30 af276e6
Existence of smooth presentations

	Yeah!
changed the statement 2011-06-24 7ab110e
Schlessinger's conditions

	I changed the condition (S2) because for non predeformation
	categories the condition just wasn't the right one (as far as I
	can tell). This has already been a bit of a bore, but hopefully
	it will not be too bad. In particular, if F is a predeformation
	category then the new condition is equivalent to the old
	condition...
changed the statement 2011-06-23 a6df7f9
Cofibered in groupoids

	Formal section with only category theory.
changed the statement and the proof 2011-06-23 5dd8964
The category C_\Lambda

	This turned out to be quite a bit more interesting than I had
	at first imagined. Can you do this without appealing to the
	naive cotangent complex? I am sure you can, but how much longer
	would it be...? Patches welcome.
assigned tag 06L5 2011-06-01 95db5d6
Tags: Added new tags

	Due to the new material in the chapter on deformation theory.
created statement with label lemma-deformation-functor-fiber-product-morphisms in formal-defos.tex 2011-06-01 ae2f687
New chapter on formal deformation theory

	Written by Alex Perry.