Proof.
Proof of (1). Suppose that y lies over the scheme V. We may think of y as a morphism (\mathit{Sch}/V)_{fppf} \to \mathcal{Y}. By definition the 2-fibre product \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} (\mathit{Sch}/V)_{fppf} is representable by an algebraic space W and the morphism W \to V is surjective, flat, and locally of finite presentation. Choose a scheme U and a surjective étale morphism U \to W. Then U \to V is also surjective, flat, and locally of finite presentation (see Morphisms of Spaces, Lemmas 67.39.7, 67.39.8, 67.5.4, 67.28.2, and 67.30.3). Hence \{ U \to V\} is an fppf covering. Denote x the object of \mathcal{X} over U corresponding to the 1-morphism (\mathit{Sch}/U)_{fppf} \to \mathcal{X}. Then \{ f(x) \to y\} is the desired fppf covering of \mathcal{Y}.
Proof of (2). Suppose that y lies over the scheme V. We may think of y as a morphism (\mathit{Sch}/V)_{fppf} \to \mathcal{Y}. By definition the 2-fibre product \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} (\mathit{Sch}/V)_{fppf} is representable by an algebraic space W and the morphism W \to V is surjective and smooth. Choose a scheme U and a surjective étale morphism U \to W. Then U \to V is also surjective and smooth (see Morphisms of Spaces, Lemmas 67.39.6, 67.5.4, and 67.37.2). Hence \{ U \to V\} is a smooth covering. By More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.38.7 there exists an étale covering \{ V_ i \to V\} such that each V_ i \to V factors through U. Denote x_ i the object of \mathcal{X} over V_ i corresponding to the 1-morphism
(\mathit{Sch}/V_ i)_{fppf} \to (\mathit{Sch}/U)_{fppf} \to \mathcal{X}.
Then \{ f(x_ i) \to y\} is the desired étale covering of \mathcal{Y}.
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #5139 by Dario Weißmann on
Comment #5332 by Johan on
There are also: