Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 96.19.10. Let f : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y} be a 1-morphism of categories fibred in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}.

  1. Assume that f is representable by algebraic spaces, surjective, flat, and locally of finite presentation. Then for any object y of \mathcal{Y} there exists an fppf covering \{ y_ i \to y\} and objects x_ i of \mathcal{X} such that f(x_ i) \cong y_ i in \mathcal{Y}.

  2. Assume that f is representable by algebraic spaces, surjective, and smooth. Then for any object y of \mathcal{Y} there exists an étale covering \{ y_ i \to y\} and objects x_ i of \mathcal{X} such that f(x_ i) \cong y_ i in \mathcal{Y}.

Proof. Proof of (1). Suppose that y lies over the scheme V. We may think of y as a morphism (\mathit{Sch}/V)_{fppf} \to \mathcal{Y}. By definition the 2-fibre product \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} (\mathit{Sch}/V)_{fppf} is representable by an algebraic space W and the morphism W \to V is surjective, flat, and locally of finite presentation. Choose a scheme U and a surjective étale morphism U \to W. Then U \to V is also surjective, flat, and locally of finite presentation (see Morphisms of Spaces, Lemmas 67.39.7, 67.39.8, 67.5.4, 67.28.2, and 67.30.3). Hence \{ U \to V\} is an fppf covering. Denote x the object of \mathcal{X} over U corresponding to the 1-morphism (\mathit{Sch}/U)_{fppf} \to \mathcal{X}. Then \{ f(x) \to y\} is the desired fppf covering of \mathcal{Y}.

Proof of (2). Suppose that y lies over the scheme V. We may think of y as a morphism (\mathit{Sch}/V)_{fppf} \to \mathcal{Y}. By definition the 2-fibre product \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} (\mathit{Sch}/V)_{fppf} is representable by an algebraic space W and the morphism W \to V is surjective and smooth. Choose a scheme U and a surjective étale morphism U \to W. Then U \to V is also surjective and smooth (see Morphisms of Spaces, Lemmas 67.39.6, 67.5.4, and 67.37.2). Hence \{ U \to V\} is a smooth covering. By More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.38.7 there exists an étale covering \{ V_ i \to V\} such that each V_ i \to V factors through U. Denote x_ i the object of \mathcal{X} over V_ i corresponding to the 1-morphism

(\mathit{Sch}/V_ i)_{fppf} \to (\mathit{Sch}/U)_{fppf} \to \mathcal{X}.

Then \{ f(x_ i) \to y\} is the desired étale covering of \mathcal{Y}. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #5139 by Dario Weißmann on

typo: the second proof of (1) should be a proof of (2)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 96.19: The relative Čech complex

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.