Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 46.4.10. With notation as in Lemma 46.4.2 we have R^ pQ(F) = 0 for all p > 0 and any adequate functor F.

Proof. Choose an exact sequence 0 \to F \to \underline{M^0} \to \underline{M^1}. Set M^2 = \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(M^0 \to M^1) so that 0 \to F \to \underline{M^0} \to \underline{M^1} \to \underline{M^2} \to 0 is a resolution. By Derived Categories, Lemma 13.21.3 we obtain a spectral sequence

R^ pQ(\underline{M^ q}) \Rightarrow R^{p + q}Q(F)

Since Q(\underline{M^ q}) = \underline{M^ q} it suffices to prove R^ pQ(\underline{M}) = 0, p > 0 for any A-module M.

Choose an injective resolution \underline{M} \to I^\bullet in the category \mathcal{P}. Suppose that R^ iQ(\underline{M}) is nonzero. Then \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(Q(I^ i) \to Q(I^{i + 1})) is strictly bigger than the image of Q(I^{i - 1}) \to Q(I^ i). Hence by Lemma 46.3.6 there exists a linearly adequate functor L and a map \varphi : L \to Q(I^ i) mapping into the kernel of Q(I^ i) \to Q(I^{i + 1}) which does not factor through the image of Q(I^{i - 1}) \to Q(I^ i). Because Q is a left adjoint to the inclusion functor the map \varphi corresponds to a map \varphi ' : L \to I^ i with the same properties. Thus \varphi ' gives a nonzero element of \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^ i_\mathcal {P}(L, \underline{M}) contradicting Lemma 46.4.9. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.