History of tag 070B
Go back to the tag's page.
type |
time |
link |
changed the proof
|
2013-12-22 |
19733a9 |
LaTeX
Added a new macro
\def\Im{\text{Im}}
and replaced all occurrences of \text{Im} by \Im
|
changed the proof
|
2013-12-22 |
e179438 |
LaTeX
Introduced a macro
\def\Ker{\text{Ker}}
and replace all occurrences of \text{Ker} with \Ker
|
changed the statement
|
2011-08-10 |
d437c1e |
First macro of the project
This gets rid of all the \nolimits commands following \lim by
defining
\def\lim{\mathop{\rm lim}\nolimits}
in the file preamble.tex. As far as I can tell this is
equivalent to \lim\nolimits where \lim is the internal command
of TeX. The dvi files produced before and after this commit are
identical.
|
changed the statement
|
2011-08-10 |
23038ed |
LaTeX: fix lim
Replaced all the occurences of \text{lim} by \lim or
\lim\nolimits depending on whether the invocation occured in
display math or not.
|
assigned tag 070B
|
2011-08-10 |
91a0ab8
|
Tags: Added new tags
|
created statement with label lemma-apply-Mittag-Leffler in homology.tex
|
2011-08-10 |
5b5b0d9 |
Producing K-injective resolutions
Suppose you admit the existence of K-injective resolutions in
the category of O-modules on a site. Next, suppose you have a
morphism f of ringed sites and a complex K^* on the source of f
whose cohomology sheaves are each acyclic for f_*. Then it
doesn't seem clear to me that R^if_*K^* is just the pushforward
of the ith cohomology sheaf of K^*. In fact I would bet this is
wrong in general. (Any example or counter argument welcome.)
To see what happens we add a lemma that tells you explicitly how
to compute a K-injective resolution of a complex where now we
assume that each of the cohomology sheaves has bounded
cohomological dimension on sufficiently many objects of the
site.
|