The Stacks project

Lemma 96.19.12. Let $f : \mathcal{U} \to \mathcal{X}$ and $g : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}$ be composable $1$-morphisms of categories fibred in groupoids over $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$. Let $\tau \in \{ Zar, {\acute{e}tale}, smooth, syntomic, \linebreak[0] fppf\} $. Assume

  1. $\mathcal{F}$ is an object of $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{X}_\tau , \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})$,

  2. for every object $x$ of $\mathcal{X}$ there exists a covering $\{ x_ i \to x\} $ in $\mathcal{X}_\tau $ such that each $x_ i$ is isomorphic to $f(u_ i)$ for some object $u_ i$ of $\mathcal{U}$,

  3. the category $\mathcal{U}$ has equalizers, and

  4. the functor $f$ is faithful.

Then there is a first quadrant spectral sequence in $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{Y}_\tau , \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {Y})$

\[ E_1^{p, q} = R^ q(g \circ f_ p)_*f_ p^{-1}\mathcal{F} \Rightarrow R^{p + q}g_*\mathcal{F} \]

where all higher direct images are computed in the $\tau $-topology.

Proof. The proof is identical to the proof of Lemma 96.19.11 except that it uses an injective resolution in $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{X}_\tau , \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})$ and it uses Lemma 96.17.6 instead of Lemma 96.17.5. $\square$


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 96.19: The relative Čech complex

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 072E. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.