The Stacks project

Lemma 96.22.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an algebraic stack over $S$ representable by the algebraic space $F$.

  1. If $\mathcal{I}$ injective in $\textit{Ab}(\mathcal{X}_{\acute{e}tale})$, then $\mathcal{I}|_{F_{\acute{e}tale}}$ is injective in $\textit{Ab}(F_{\acute{e}tale})$,

  2. If $\mathcal{I}^\bullet $ is a K-injective complex in $\textit{Ab}(\mathcal{X}_{\acute{e}tale})$, then $\mathcal{I}^\bullet |_{F_{\acute{e}tale}}$ is a K-injective complex in $\textit{Ab}(F_{\acute{e}tale})$.

The same does not hold for modules.

Proof. This follows formally from the fact that the restriction functor $\pi _{F, *} = i_ F^{-1}$ (see Lemma 96.10.1) is right adjoint to the exact functor $\pi _ F^{-1}$, see Homology, Lemma 12.29.1 and Derived Categories, Lemma 13.31.9. To see that the lemma does not hold for modules, we refer the reader to Étale Cohomology, Lemma 59.99.1. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 075L. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.