Lemma 10.68.9. Let R be a ring. Let M be an R-module. Let f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in R and e_1, \ldots , e_ r > 0 integers. Then f_1, \ldots , f_ r is an M-regular sequence if and only if f_1^{e_1}, \ldots , f_ r^{e_ r} is an M-regular sequence.
Proof. We will prove this by induction on r. If r = 1 this follows from the following two easy facts: (a) a power of a nonzerodivisor on M is a nonzerodivisor on M and (b) a divisor of a nonzerodivisor on M is a nonzerodivisor on M. If r > 1, then by induction applied to M/f_1M we have that f_1, f_2, \ldots , f_ r is an M-regular sequence if and only if f_1, f_2^{e_2}, \ldots , f_ r^{e_ r} is an M-regular sequence. Thus it suffices to show, given e > 0, that f_1^ e, f_2, \ldots , f_ r is an M-regular sequence if and only if f_1, \ldots , f_ r is an M-regular sequence. We will prove this by induction on e. The case e = 1 is trivial. Since f_1 is a nonzerodivisor under both assumptions (by the case r = 1) we have a short exact sequence
Suppose that f_1, f_2, \ldots , f_ r is an M-regular sequence. Then by induction the elements f_2, \ldots , f_ r are M/f_1M and M/f_1^{e - 1}M-regular sequences. By Lemma 10.68.8 f_2, \ldots , f_ r is M/f_1^ eM-regular. Hence f_1^ e, f_2, \ldots , f_ r is M-regular. Conversely, suppose that f_1^ e, f_2, \ldots , f_ r is an M-regular sequence. Then f_2 : M/f_1^ eM \to M/f_1^ eM is injective, hence f_2 : M/f_1M \to M/f_1M is injective, hence by induction(!) f_2 : M/f_1^{e - 1}M \to M/f_1^{e - 1}M is injective, hence
is a short exact sequence by Lemma 10.4.1. This proves the converse for r = 2. If r > 2, then we have f_3 : M/(f_1^ e, f_2)M \to M/(f_1^ e, f_2)M is injective, hence f_3 : M/(f_1, f_2)M \to M/(f_1, f_2)M is injective, and so on. Some details omitted. \square
Comments (4)
Comment #787 by Keenan Kidwell on
Comment #805 by Johan on
Comment #3793 by Kestutis Cesnavicius on
Comment #3915 by Johan on