The Stacks project

59.3 Some explicit divided power thickenings

The constructions in this section will help us to define the connection on a crystal in modules on the crystalline site.

Lemma 59.3.1. Let $(A, I, \gamma )$ be a divided power ring. Let $M$ be an $A$-module. Let $B = A \oplus M$ as an $A$-algebra where $M$ is an ideal of square zero and set $J = I \oplus M$. Set

\[ \delta _ n(x + z) = \gamma _ n(x) + \gamma _{n - 1}(x)z \]

for $x \in I$ and $z \in M$. Then $\delta $ is a divided power structure and $A \to B$ is a homomorphism of divided power rings from $(A, I, \gamma )$ to $(B, J, \delta )$.

Proof. We have to check conditions (1) – (5) of Divided Power Algebra, Definition 23.2.1. We will prove this directly for this case, but please see the proof of the next lemma for a method which avoids calculations. Conditions (1) and (3) are clear. Condition (2) follows from

\begin{align*} \delta _ n(x + z)\delta _ m(x + z) & = (\gamma _ n(x) + \gamma _{n - 1}(x)z)(\gamma _ m(x) + \gamma _{m - 1}(x)z) \\ & = \gamma _ n(x)\gamma _ m(x) + \gamma _ n(x)\gamma _{m - 1}(x)z + \gamma _{n - 1}(x)\gamma _ m(x)z \\ & = \frac{(n + m)!}{n!m!} \gamma _{n + m}(x) + \left(\frac{(n + m - 1)!}{n!(m - 1)!} + \frac{(n + m - 1)!}{(n - 1)!m!}\right) \gamma _{n + m - 1}(x) z \\ & = \frac{(n + m)!}{n!m!}\delta _{n + m}(x + z) \end{align*}

Condition (5) follows from

\begin{align*} \delta _ n(\delta _ m(x + z)) & = \delta _ n(\gamma _ m(x) + \gamma _{m - 1}(x)z) \\ & = \gamma _ n(\gamma _ m(x)) + \gamma _{n - 1}(\gamma _ m(x))\gamma _{m - 1}(x)z \\ & = \frac{(nm)!}{n! (m!)^ n} \gamma _{nm}(x) + \frac{((n - 1)m)!}{(n - 1)! (m!)^{n - 1}} \gamma _{(n - 1)m}(x) \gamma _{m - 1}(x) z \\ & = \frac{(nm)!}{n! (m!)^ n}(\gamma _{nm}(x) + \gamma _{nm - 1}(x) z) \end{align*}

by elementary number theory. To prove (4) we have to see that

\[ \delta _ n(x + x' + z + z') = \gamma _ n(x + x') + \gamma _{n - 1}(x + x')(z + z') \]

is equal to

\[ \sum \nolimits _{i = 0}^ n (\gamma _ i(x) + \gamma _{i - 1}(x)z) (\gamma _{n - i}(x') + \gamma _{n - i - 1}(x')z') \]

This follows easily on collecting the coefficients of $1$, $z$, and $z'$ and using condition (4) for $\gamma $. $\square$

Lemma 59.3.2. Let $(A, I, \gamma )$ be a divided power ring. Let $M$, $N$ be $A$-modules. Let $q : M \times M \to N$ be an $A$-bilinear map. Let $B = A \oplus M \oplus N$ as an $A$-algebra with multiplication

\[ (x, z, w)\cdot (x', z', w') = (xx', xz' + x'z, xw' + x'w + q(z, z') + q(z', z)) \]

and set $J = I \oplus M \oplus N$. Set

\[ \delta _ n(x, z, w) = (\gamma _ n(x), \gamma _{n - 1}(x)z, \gamma _{n - 1}(x)w + \gamma _{n - 2}(x)q(z, z)) \]

for $(x, z, w) \in J$. Then $\delta $ is a divided power structure and $A \to B$ is a homomorphism of divided power rings from $(A, I, \gamma )$ to $(B, J, \delta )$.

Proof. Suppose we want to prove that property (4) of Divided Power Algebra, Definition 23.2.1 is satisfied. Pick $(x, z, w)$ and $(x', z', w')$ in $J$. Pick a map

\[ A_0 = \mathbf{Z}\langle s, s'\rangle \longrightarrow A,\quad s \longmapsto x, s' \longmapsto x' \]

which is possible by the universal property of divided power polynomial rings. Set $M_0 = A_0 \oplus A_0$ and $N_0 = A_0 \oplus A_0 \oplus M_0 \otimes _{A_0} M_0$. Let $q_0 : M_0 \times M_0 \to N_0$ be the obvious map. Define $M_0 \to M$ as the $A_0$-linear map which sends the basis vectors of $M_0$ to $z$ and $z'$. Define $N_0 \to N$ as the $A_0$ linear map which sends the first two basis vectors of $N_0$ to $w$ and $w'$ and uses $M_0 \otimes _{A_0} M_0 \to M \otimes _ A M \xrightarrow {q} N$ on the last summand. Then we see that it suffices to prove the identity (4) for the situation $(A_0, M_0, N_0, q_0)$. Similarly for the other identities. This reduces us to the case of a $\mathbf{Z}$-torsion free ring $A$ and $A$-torsion free modules. In this case all we have to do is show that

\[ n! \delta _ n(x, z, w) = (x, z, w)^ n \]

in the ring $A$, see Divided Power Algebra, Lemma 23.2.2. To see this note that

\[ (x, z, w)^2 = (x^2, 2xz, 2xw + 2q(z, z)) \]

and by induction

\[ (x, z, w)^ n = (x^ n, nx^{n - 1}z, nx^{n - 1}w + n(n - 1)x^{n - 2}q(z, z)) \]

On the other hand,

\[ n! \delta _ n(x, z, w) = (n!\gamma _ n(x), n!\gamma _{n - 1}(x)z, n!\gamma _{n - 1}(x)w + n!\gamma _{n - 2}(x) q(z, z)) \]

which matches. This finishes the proof. $\square$


Comments (1)

Comment #5895 by Simon Schirren on

small typo in the first lemma.


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 07HG. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.