60.3 Some explicit divided power thickenings
The constructions in this section will help us to define the connection on a crystal in modules on the crystalline site.
Lemma 60.3.1. Let (A, I, \gamma ) be a divided power ring. Let M be an A-module. Let B = A \oplus M as an A-algebra where M is an ideal of square zero and set J = I \oplus M. Set
\delta _ n(x + z) = \gamma _ n(x) + \gamma _{n - 1}(x)z
for x \in I and z \in M. Then \delta is a divided power structure and A \to B is a homomorphism of divided power rings from (A, I, \gamma ) to (B, J, \delta ).
Proof.
We have to check conditions (1) – (5) of Divided Power Algebra, Definition 23.2.1. We will prove this directly for this case, but please see the proof of the next lemma for a method which avoids calculations. Conditions (1) and (3) are clear. Condition (2) follows from
\begin{align*} \delta _ n(x + z)\delta _ m(x + z) & = (\gamma _ n(x) + \gamma _{n - 1}(x)z)(\gamma _ m(x) + \gamma _{m - 1}(x)z) \\ & = \gamma _ n(x)\gamma _ m(x) + \gamma _ n(x)\gamma _{m - 1}(x)z + \gamma _{n - 1}(x)\gamma _ m(x)z \\ & = \frac{(n + m)!}{n!m!} \gamma _{n + m}(x) + \left(\frac{(n + m - 1)!}{n!(m - 1)!} + \frac{(n + m - 1)!}{(n - 1)!m!}\right) \gamma _{n + m - 1}(x) z \\ & = \frac{(n + m)!}{n!m!}\delta _{n + m}(x + z) \end{align*}
Condition (5) follows from
\begin{align*} \delta _ n(\delta _ m(x + z)) & = \delta _ n(\gamma _ m(x) + \gamma _{m - 1}(x)z) \\ & = \gamma _ n(\gamma _ m(x)) + \gamma _{n - 1}(\gamma _ m(x))\gamma _{m - 1}(x)z \\ & = \frac{(nm)!}{n! (m!)^ n} \gamma _{nm}(x) + \frac{((n - 1)m)!}{(n - 1)! (m!)^{n - 1}} \gamma _{(n - 1)m}(x) \gamma _{m - 1}(x) z \\ & = \frac{(nm)!}{n! (m!)^ n}(\gamma _{nm}(x) + \gamma _{nm - 1}(x) z) \end{align*}
by elementary number theory. To prove (4) we have to see that
\delta _ n(x + x' + z + z') = \gamma _ n(x + x') + \gamma _{n - 1}(x + x')(z + z')
is equal to
\sum \nolimits _{i = 0}^ n (\gamma _ i(x) + \gamma _{i - 1}(x)z) (\gamma _{n - i}(x') + \gamma _{n - i - 1}(x')z')
This follows easily on collecting the coefficients of 1, z, and z' and using condition (4) for \gamma .
\square
Lemma 60.3.2. Let (A, I, \gamma ) be a divided power ring. Let M, N be A-modules. Let q : M \times M \to N be an A-bilinear map. Let B = A \oplus M \oplus N as an A-algebra with multiplication
(x, z, w)\cdot (x', z', w') = (xx', xz' + x'z, xw' + x'w + q(z, z') + q(z', z))
and set J = I \oplus M \oplus N. Set
\delta _ n(x, z, w) = (\gamma _ n(x), \gamma _{n - 1}(x)z, \gamma _{n - 1}(x)w + \gamma _{n - 2}(x)q(z, z))
for (x, z, w) \in J. Then \delta is a divided power structure and A \to B is a homomorphism of divided power rings from (A, I, \gamma ) to (B, J, \delta ).
Proof.
Suppose we want to prove that property (4) of Divided Power Algebra, Definition 23.2.1 is satisfied. Pick (x, z, w) and (x', z', w') in J. Pick a map
A_0 = \mathbf{Z}\langle s, s'\rangle \longrightarrow A,\quad s \longmapsto x, s' \longmapsto x'
which is possible by the universal property of divided power polynomial rings. Set M_0 = A_0 \oplus A_0 and N_0 = A_0 \oplus A_0 \oplus M_0 \otimes _{A_0} M_0. Let q_0 : M_0 \times M_0 \to N_0 be the obvious map. Define M_0 \to M as the A_0-linear map which sends the basis vectors of M_0 to z and z'. Define N_0 \to N as the A_0 linear map which sends the first two basis vectors of N_0 to w and w' and uses M_0 \otimes _{A_0} M_0 \to M \otimes _ A M \xrightarrow {q} N on the last summand. Then we see that it suffices to prove the identity (4) for the situation (A_0, M_0, N_0, q_0). Similarly for the other identities. This reduces us to the case of a \mathbf{Z}-torsion free ring A and A-torsion free modules. In this case all we have to do is show that
n! \delta _ n(x, z, w) = (x, z, w)^ n
in the ring A, see Divided Power Algebra, Lemma 23.2.2. To see this note that
(x, z, w)^2 = (x^2, 2xz, 2xw + 2q(z, z))
and by induction
(x, z, w)^ n = (x^ n, nx^{n - 1}z, nx^{n - 1}w + n(n - 1)x^{n - 2}q(z, z))
On the other hand,
n! \delta _ n(x, z, w) = (n!\gamma _ n(x), n!\gamma _{n - 1}(x)z, n!\gamma _{n - 1}(x)w + n!\gamma _{n - 2}(x) q(z, z))
which matches. This finishes the proof.
\square
Comments (0)