60.4 Compatibility
This section isn't required reading; it explains how our discussion fits with that of [Berthelot]. Consider the following technical notion.
Definition 60.4.1. Let (A, I, \gamma ) and (B, J, \delta ) be divided power rings. Let A \to B be a ring map. We say \delta is compatible with \gamma if there exists a divided power structure \bar\gamma on J + IB such that
(A, I, \gamma ) \to (B, J + IB, \bar\gamma )\quad \text{and}\quad (B, J, \delta ) \to (B, J + IB, \bar\gamma )
are homomorphisms of divided power rings.
Let p be a prime number. Let (A, I, \gamma ) be a divided power ring. Let A \to C be a ring map with p nilpotent in C. Assume that \gamma extends to IC (see Divided Power Algebra, Lemma 23.4.2). In this situation, the (big affine) crystalline site of \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(C) over \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) as defined in [Berthelot] is the opposite of the category of systems
(B, J, \delta , A \to B, C \to B/J)
where
(B, J, \delta ) is a divided power ring with p nilpotent in B,
\delta is compatible with \gamma , and
the diagram
\xymatrix{ B \ar[r] & B/J \\ A \ar[u] \ar[r] & C \ar[u] }
is commutative.
The conditions “\gamma extends to C and \delta compatible with \gamma ” are used in [Berthelot] to ensure that the crystalline cohomology of \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(C) is the same as the crystalline cohomology of \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(C/IC). We will avoid this issue by working exclusively with C such that IC = 01. In this case, for a system (B, J, \delta , A \to B, C \to B/J) as above, the commutativity of the displayed diagram above implies IB \subset J and compatibility is equivalent to the condition that (A, I, \gamma ) \to (B, J, \delta ) is a homomorphism of divided power rings.
Comments (2)
Comment #7820 by Que on
Comment #8047 by Stacks Project on