Proposition 60.17.4. The functor

of Lemma 60.17.3 is an equivalence of categories.

Proposition 60.17.4. The functor

\[ \begin{matrix} \text{crystals in quasi-coherent}
\\ \mathcal{O}_{X/S}\text{-modules on }\text{Cris}(X/S)
\end{matrix} \longrightarrow \begin{matrix} \text{pairs }(M, \nabla )\text{ satisfying}
\\ \text{(07JB), (07JC), (07JD), and (07JE)}
\end{matrix} \]

of Lemma 60.17.3 is an equivalence of categories.

**Proof.**
Let $(M, \nabla )$ be given. We are going to construct a crystal in quasi-coherent modules $\mathcal{F}$. Write $\nabla (m) = \sum \theta _ i(m)\text{d}x_ i$. Then $\theta _ i \circ \theta _ j = \theta _ j \circ \theta _ i$ and we can set $\theta _ K(m) = (\prod \theta _ i^{k_ i})(m)$ for any multi-index $K = (k_ i)$ with $k_ i \geq 0$ and $\sum k_ i < \infty $.

Let $(U, T, \delta )$ be any object of $\text{Cris}(X/S)$ with $T$ affine. Say $T = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B)$ and the ideal of $U \to T$ is $J_ B \subset B$. By Lemma 60.5.6 there exists an integer $e$ and a morphism

\[ f : (U, T, \delta ) \longrightarrow (X, T_ e, \bar\gamma ) \]

where $T_ e = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(D_ e)$ as in the proof of Lemma 60.17.3. Choose such an $e$ and $f$; denote $f : D \to B$ also the corresponding divided power $A$-algebra map. We will set $\mathcal{F}_ T$ equal to the quasi-coherent sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_ T$-modules associated to the $B$-module

\[ M \otimes _{D, f} B. \]

However, we have to show that this is independent of the choice of $f$. Suppose that $g : D \to B$ is a second such morphism. Since $f$ and $g$ are morphisms in $\text{Cris}(X/S)$ we see that the image of $f - g : D \to B$ is contained in the divided power ideal $J_ B$. Write $\xi _ i = f(x_ i) - g(x_ i) \in J_ B$. By analogy with the proof of Lemma 60.17.3 we define an isomorphism

\[ c_{f, g} : M \otimes _{D, f} B \longrightarrow M \otimes _{D, g} B \]

by the formula

\[ m \otimes 1 \longmapsto \sum \nolimits _ K \theta _ K(m) \otimes \prod \xi _ i^{[k_ i]} \]

which makes sense by our remarks above and the fact that $\nabla $ is topologically quasi-nilpotent (so the sum is finite!). A computation shows that

\[ c_{g, h} \circ c_{f, g} = c_{f, h} \]

if given a third morphism $h : (U, T, \delta ) \longrightarrow (X, T_ e, \bar\gamma )$. It is also true that $c_{f, f} = 1$. Hence these maps are all isomorphisms and we see that the module $\mathcal{F}_ T$ is independent of the choice of $f$.

If $a : (U', T', \delta ') \to (U, T, \delta )$ is a morphism of affine objects of $\text{Cris}(X/S)$, then choosing $f' = f \circ a$ it is clear that there exists a canonical isomorphism $a^*\mathcal{F}_ T \to \mathcal{F}_{T'}$. We omit the verification that this map is independent of the choice of $f$. Using these maps as the restriction maps it is clear that we obtain a crystal in quasi-coherent modules on the full subcategory of $\text{Cris}(X/S)$ consisting of affine objects. We omit the proof that this extends to a crystal on all of $\text{Cris}(X/S)$. We also omit the proof that this procedure is a functor and that it is quasi-inverse to the functor constructed in Lemma 60.17.3. $\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)

There are also: