Lemma 60.17.3. In the situation above there is a functor
Proof. Let \mathcal{F} be a crystal in quasi-coherent modules on X/S. Set T_ e = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(D_ e) so that (X, T_ e, \bar\gamma ) is an object of \text{Cris}(X/S) for e \gg 0. We have morphisms
which are closed immersions. We set
Note that since \mathcal{F} is locally quasi-coherent we have \mathcal{F}_{T_ e} = \widetilde{M_ e}. Since \mathcal{F} is a crystal we have M_ e = M_{e + 1}/p^ eM_{e + 1}. Hence we see that M_ e = M/p^ eM and that M is p-adically complete, see Algebra, Lemma 10.98.2.
By Lemma 60.15.1 we know that \mathcal{F} comes endowed with a canonical integrable connection \nabla : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F} \otimes \Omega _{X/S}. If we evaluate this connection on the objects T_ e constructed above we obtain a canonical integrable connection
To see that this is topologically nilpotent we work out what this means.
Now we can do the same procedure for the rings D(n). This produces a p-adically complete D(n)-module M(n). Again using the crystal property of \mathcal{F} we obtain isomorphisms
compare with the proof of Lemma 60.15.1. Denote c the composition from left to right. Pick m \in M. Write \xi _ i = x_ i \otimes 1 - 1 \otimes x_ i. Using (60.17.1.1) we can write uniquely
for some \theta _ K(m) \in M where the sum is over multi-indices K = (k_ i) with k_ i \geq 0 and \sum k_ i < \infty . Set \theta _ i = \theta _ K where K has a 1 in the ith spot and zeros elsewhere. We have
as can be seen by comparing with the definition of \nabla . Namely, the defining equation is p_1^*m = \nabla (m) - c(p_0^*m) in Lemma 60.15.1 but the sign works out because in the Stacks project we consistently use \text{d}f = p_1(f) - p_0(f) modulo the ideal of the diagonal squared, and hence \xi _ i = x_ i \otimes 1 - 1 \otimes x_ i maps to -\text{d}x_ i modulo the ideal of the diagonal squared.
Denote q_ i : D \to D(2) and q_{ij} : D(1) \to D(2) the coprojections corresponding to the indices i, j. As in the last paragraph of the proof of Lemma 60.15.1 we see that
This means that
in M \otimes ^\wedge _{D, q_2} D(2) where
In particular \zeta ''_ i = \zeta _ i + \zeta '_ i and we have that D(2) is the p-adic completion of the divided power polynomial ring in \zeta _ i, \zeta '_ i over q_2(D), see Lemma 60.17.1. Comparing coefficients in the expression above it follows immediately that \theta _ i \circ \theta _ j = \theta _ j \circ \theta _ i (this provides an alternative proof of the integrability of \nabla ) and that
In particular, as the sum expressing c(m \otimes 1) above has to converge p-adically we conclude that for each i and each m \in M only a finite number of \theta _ i^ k(m) are allowed to be nonzero modulo p. \square
Comments (8)
Comment #3059 by Lei Zhang on
Comment #3063 by Zhang on
Comment #3132 by Lei Zhang on
Comment #3133 by Lei Zhang on
Comment #3163 by Johan on
Comment #3175 by Lei Zhang on
Comment #5924 by Matthieu Romagny on
Comment #5925 by Pieter Belmans on
There are also: