The Stacks project

Lemma 59.17.1. Let $D$ and $D(n)$ be as in (59.17.0.1) and (59.17.0.4). The coprojection $P \to P \otimes _ A \ldots \otimes _ A P$, $f \mapsto f \otimes 1 \otimes \ldots \otimes 1$ induces an isomorphism

59.17.1.1
\begin{equation} \label{crystalline-equation-structure-Dn} D(n) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ e D\langle \xi _ i(j) \rangle /p^ eD\langle \xi _ i(j) \rangle \end{equation}

of algebras over $D$ with

\[ \xi _ i(j) = x_ i \otimes 1 \otimes \ldots \otimes 1 - 1 \otimes \ldots \otimes 1 \otimes x_ i \otimes 1 \otimes \ldots \otimes 1 \]

for $j = 1, \ldots , n$ where the second $x_ i$ is placed in the $j + 1$st slot; recall that $D(n)$ is constructed starting with the $n + 1$-fold tensor product of $P$ over $A$.

Proof. We have

\[ P \otimes _ A \ldots \otimes _ A P = P[\xi _ i(j)] \]

and $J(n)$ is generated by $J$ and the elements $\xi _ i(j)$. Hence the lemma follows from Lemma 59.2.5. $\square$


Comments (3)

Comment #5442 by Hao on

In the definition of , is the second at the -th place?

Comment #5444 by Hao on

In the definition of , is the second at the -th place? If so, why is the equation in the proof true? For example, there is only one and ?

Comment #5666 by on

Aha, the confusion is that the numbering starts at . Observe that see just above this lemma in the text. Hence has one more variable than for each and you can take it to be . Please don't get me started on the signs! Anyway, I tried to clarify this here.

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 59.17: Crystals in quasi-coherent modules

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 07L2. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.