Lemma 60.18.1. In Situation 60.7.5. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a locally quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_{X/S}$-module on $\text{Cris}(X/S)$. Then we have

for all $p > 0$ and all $(U, T, \delta )$ with $T$ or $U$ affine.

Lemma 60.18.1. In Situation 60.7.5. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a locally quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_{X/S}$-module on $\text{Cris}(X/S)$. Then we have

\[ H^ p((U, T, \delta ), \mathcal{F}) = 0 \]

for all $p > 0$ and all $(U, T, \delta )$ with $T$ or $U$ affine.

**Proof.**
As $U \to T$ is a thickening we see that $U$ is affine if and only if $T$ is affine, see Limits, Lemma 32.11.1. Having said this, let us apply Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.10.9 to the collection $\mathcal{B}$ of affine objects $(U, T, \delta )$ and the collection $\text{Cov}$ of affine open coverings $\mathcal{U} = \{ (U_ i, T_ i, \delta _ i) \to (U, T, \delta )\} $. The Čech complex ${\check C}^*(\mathcal{U}, \mathcal{F})$ for such a covering is simply the Čech complex of the quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ T$-module $\mathcal{F}_ T$ (here we are using the assumption that $\mathcal{F}$ is locally quasi-coherent) with respect to the affine open covering $\{ T_ i \to T\} $ of the affine scheme $T$. Hence the Čech cohomology is zero by Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.2.6 and 30.2.2. Thus the hypothesis of Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.10.9 are satisfied and we win.
$\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)

There are also: