The Stacks project

Proof. If $X$ is finite Jacobson, $X_0 \subset X$ the subset of closed points, then, on the one hand, $\overline{X_0} = X$. On the other hand, $X$, and hence $X_0$ is finite, so $X_0 =\{ x_1, \ldots , x_ n\} = \bigcup _{i = 1, \ldots , n} \{ x_ i\} $ is a finite union of closed sets, hence closed, so $X = \overline{X_0} = X_0$. Every point is closed, and by finiteness, every point is open. $\square$


Comments (2)

Comment #778 by Keenan Kidwell on

Is there something wrong with the following argument that a finite Jacobson space discrete without any separation axioms? If is finite Jacobson, the subset of closed points, then, on the one hand, . On the other hand, , and hence is finite, so is a finite union of closed sets, hence closed, so . Every point is closed, and by finiteness, every point is open.

There are also:

  • 8 comment(s) on Section 5.18: Jacobson spaces

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 07JU. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.