Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

The Stacks project

History of tag 07YL

Go back to the tag's page.

type time link
changed the statement and the proof 2013-12-22 e179438
LaTeX

Introduced a macro

\def\Ker{\text{Ker}}

and replace all occurrences of \text{Ker} with \Ker
changed the statement and the proof 2013-03-27 ba00249
New macro: \NL for naive cotangent complex

The naive cotangent complex is an important ingredient to several
topics discussed in the Stacks project. It deserves its own macro.
changed the statement and the proof 2013-03-27 2ccbbe3
Fix error in artin.tex pointed out by David Rydh

The proof of Lemma Tag 07YM was wrong in two ways:

-- We were using the condition (RS*) in some cases where it didn't
   apply, namely for an extension A' of a Noetherian ring A by a
   module isomorphic to the residue field of a finite type point.
-- The second mistake was in some sense the same mistake thinking that
   the ring A' was Noetherian.

The solution, as pointed out by David Rydh, is twofold:

-- Strengthen assumption (RS*) to cover the first snafu
-- Only prove openess of versality at closed points

As far as I can see, this is harmless in all applications.

There are still some things left to fix. In particular, some of
the material concerning T_x(-) has to be fixed to deal with
non-finitely generated modules.
changed the proof 2013-02-06 6163548
Move material on fibre products rings and add more

This is what happens when you initially aren't general enough.
assigned tag 07YL 2012-07-03 3fe4cf9
Tags: Added new tags
changed the statement 2012-07-03 65e41c9
Sharpen criterion openness versality

	Just having a single map with two properties is enough...
created statement with label lemma-construct-essential-surjection in artin.tex 2012-06-28 d82e033
Some material about obstruction theories

	This includes the notion of a naive obstruction theory and a
	proof that such a thing is good enough to give openness of
	versality. This was introduced on the blog

	http://math.columbia.edu/~dejong/wordpress/?p=2472

	It is just working out what you would get if you actually had an
	algebraic stack. It seems likely that Artin was motivated in
	formulating his axioms by the idea that such a thing should
	exist.

	Hopefully we can use this to prove openness of versality for
	some nice cases such as families of proper flat algebraic
	spaces... We'll see.