Lemma 110.64.1. There exists a ring $R$, a distinguished triangle $(K, L, M, \alpha , \beta , \gamma )$ in the homotopy category $K(R)$, and an endomorphism $(a, b, c)$ of this distinguished triangle, such that $K$, $L$, $M$ are perfect complexes and $\text{Tr}_ K(a) + \text{Tr}_ M(c) \not= \text{Tr}_ L(b)$.

## 110.64 Example of non-additivity of traces

Let $k$ be a field and let $R = k[\epsilon ]$ be the ring of dual numbers over $k$. In other words, $R = k[x]/(x^2)$ and $\epsilon $ is the congruence class of $x$ in $R$. Consider the short exact sequence of complexes

Here the columns are the complexes, the first row is placed in degree $0$, and the second row in degree $1$. Denote the first complex (i.e., the left column) by $A^\bullet $, the second by $B^\bullet $ and the third $C^\bullet $. We claim that the diagram

commutes in $K(R)$, i.e., is a diagram of complexes commuting up to homotopy. Namely, the square on the right commutes and the one on the left is off by the homotopy $1 : A^1 \to B^0$. On the other hand,

**Proof.**
Consider the example above. The map $\gamma : C^\bullet \to A^\bullet [1]$ is given by multiplication by $\epsilon $ in degree $0$, see Derived Categories, Definition 13.10.1. Hence it is also true that

commutes in $K(R)$ as $\epsilon (1 + \epsilon ) = \epsilon $. Thus we indeed have a morphism of distinguished triangles. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)