The Stacks project

107.60 Derived base change

Let $R \to R'$ be a ring map. In More on Algebra, Section 15.58 we construct a derived base change functor $- \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} R' : D(R) \to D(R')$. Next, let $R \to A$ be a second ring map. Picture

\[ \xymatrix{ A \ar[r] & A \otimes _ R R' \ar@{=}[r] & A' \\ R \ar[u] \ar[r] & R' \ar[u] \ar[ur] } \]

Given an $A$-module $M$ the tensor product $M \otimes _ R R'$ is a $A \otimes _ R R'$-module, i.e., an $A'$-module. For the ring map $A \to A'$ there is a derived functor

\[ - \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} A' : D(A) \longrightarrow D(A') \]

but this functor does not agree with $- \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} R'$ in general. More precisely, for $K \in D(A)$ the canonical map

\[ K \otimes _ R^{\mathbf{L}} R' \longrightarrow K \otimes _ A^{\mathbf{L}} A' \]

in $D(R')$ constructed in More on Algebra, Equation (15.59.0.1) isn't an isomorphism in general. Thus one may wonder if there exists a “derived base change functor” $T : D(A) \to D(A')$, i.e., a functor such that $T(K)$ maps to $K \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} R'$ in $D(R')$. In this section we show it does not exist in general.

Let $k$ be a field. Set $R = k[x, y]$. Set $R' = R/(xy)$ and $A = R/(x^2)$. The object $A \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} R'$ in $D(R')$ is represented by

\[ x^2 : R' \longrightarrow R' \]

and we have $H^0(A \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} R') = A \otimes _ R R'$. We claim that there does not exist an object $E$ of $D(A \otimes _ R R')$ mapping to $A \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} R'$ in $D(R')$. Namely, for such an $E$ the module $H^0(E)$ would be free, hence $E$ would decompose as $H^0(E)[0] \oplus H^{-1}(E)[1]$. But it is easy to see that $A \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} R'$ is not isomorphic to the sum of its cohomology groups in $D(R')$.

Lemma 107.60.1. Let $R \to R'$ and $R \to A$ be ring maps. In general there does not exist a functor $T : D(A) \to D(A \otimes _ R R')$ of triangulated categories such that an $A$-module $M$ gives an object $T(M)$ of $D(A \otimes _ R R')$ which maps to $M \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} R'$ under the map $D(A \otimes _ R R') \to D(R')$.

Proof. See discussion above. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 08J2. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.