Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 99.5.4. In Situation 99.5.1 the functor p : \mathcal{C}\! \mathit{oh}_{X/B} \longrightarrow (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} is a stack in groupoids.

Proof. To prove that \mathcal{C}\! \mathit{oh}_{X/B} is a stack in groupoids, we have to show that the presheaves \mathit{Isom} are sheaves and that descent data are effective. The statement on \mathit{Isom} follows from Lemma 99.5.3, see Algebraic Stacks, Lemma 94.10.11. Let us prove the statement on descent data. Suppose that \{ a_ i : T_ i \to T\} is an fppf covering of schemes over S. Let (\xi _ i, \varphi _{ij}) be a descent datum for \{ T_ i \to T\} with values in \mathcal{C}\! \mathit{oh}_{X/B}. For each i we can write \xi _ i = (T_ i, g_ i, \mathcal{F}_ i). Denote \text{pr}_0 : T_ i \times _ T T_ j \to T_ i and \text{pr}_1 : T_ i \times _ T T_ j \to T_ j the projections. The condition that \xi _ i|_{T_ i \times _ T T_ j} = \xi _ j|_{T_ i \times _ T T_ j} implies in particular that g_ i \circ \text{pr}_0 = g_ j \circ \text{pr}_1. Thus there exists a unique morphism g : T \to B such that g_ i = g \circ a_ i, see Descent on Spaces, Lemma 74.7.2. Denote X_ T = T \times _{g, B} X. Set X_ i = X_{T_ i} = T_ i \times _{g_ i, B} X = T_ i \times _{a_ i, T} X_ T and

X_{ij} = X_{T_ i} \times _{X_ T} X_{T_ j} = X_ i \times _{X_ T} X_ j

with projections \text{pr}_ i and \text{pr}_ j to X_ i and X_ j. Observe that the pullback of (T_ i, g_ i, \mathcal{F}_ i) by \text{pr}_0 : T_ i \times _ T T_ j \to T_ i is given by (T_ i \times _ T T_ j, g_ i \circ \text{pr}_0, \text{pr}_ i^*\mathcal{F}_ i). Hence a descent datum for \{ T_ i \to T\} in \mathcal{C}\! \mathit{oh}_{X/B} is given by the objects (T_ i, g \circ a_ i, \mathcal{F}_ i) and for each pair i, j an isomorphism of \mathcal{O}_{X_{ij}}-modules

\varphi _{ij} : \text{pr}_ i^*\mathcal{F}_ i \longrightarrow \text{pr}_ j^*\mathcal{F}_ j

satisfying the cocycle condition over (the pullback of X to) T_ i \times _ T T_ j \times _ T T_ k. Ok, and now we simply use that \{ X_ i \to X_ T\} is an fppf covering so that we can view (\mathcal{F}_ i, \varphi _{ij}) as a descent datum for this covering. By Descent on Spaces, Proposition 74.4.1 this descent datum is effective and we obtain a quasi-coherent sheaf \mathcal{F} over X_ T restricting to \mathcal{F}_ i on X_ i. By Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.31.5 we see that \mathcal{F} is flat over T and Descent on Spaces, Lemma 74.6.2 guarantees that \mathcal{Q} is of finite presentation as an \mathcal{O}_{X_ T}-module. Finally, by Descent on Spaces, Lemma 74.11.19 we see that the scheme theoretic support of \mathcal{F} is proper over T as we've assumed the scheme theoretic support of \mathcal{F}_ i is proper over T_ i (note that taking scheme theoretic support commutes with flat base change by Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.30.10). In this way we obtain our desired object over T. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #2732 by Emanuel Reinecke on

Typos in the two last sentences: assumed, way we obtain


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.