The Stacks project

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

18.25 Closed immersions of ringed topoi

When do we declare a morphism of ringed topoi $i : (\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}), \mathcal{O}) \to (\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D}), \mathcal{O}')$ to be a closed immersion? By analogy with the discussion in Modules, Section 17.13 it seems natural to assume at least:

  1. The functor $i$ is a closed immersion of topoi (Sites, Definition 7.43.7).

  2. The associated map $\mathcal{O}' \to i_*\mathcal{O}$ is surjective.

These conditions already imply a number of pleasing results which we discuss in this section. However, it seems prudent to not actually define the notion of a closed immersion of ringed topoi as there are many different definitions we could use.

Lemma 18.25.1. Let $i : (\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}), \mathcal{O}) \to (\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D}), \mathcal{O}')$ be a morphism of ringed topoi. Assume $i$ is a closed immersion of topoi and $i^\sharp : \mathcal{O}' \to i_*\mathcal{O}$ is surjective. Denote $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}'$ the kernel of $i^\sharp $. The functor

\[ i_* : \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O}) \longrightarrow \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O}') \]

is exact, fully faithful, with essential image those $\mathcal{O}'$-modules $\mathcal{G}$ such that $\mathcal{I}\mathcal{G} = 0$.

Proof. By Lemma 18.15.2 and Sites, Lemma 7.43.8 we see that $i_*$ is exact. From the fact that $i_*$ is fully faithful on sheaves of sets, and the fact that $i^\sharp $ is surjective it follows that $i_*$ is fully faithful as a functor $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O}) \to \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O}')$. Namely, suppose that $\alpha : i_*\mathcal{F}_1 \to i_*\mathcal{F}_2$ is an $\mathcal{O}'$-module map. By the fully faithfulness of $i_*$ we obtain a map $\beta : \mathcal{F}_1 \to \mathcal{F}_2$ of sheaves of sets. To prove $\beta $ is a map of modules we have to show that

\[ \xymatrix{ \mathcal{O} \times \mathcal{F}_1 \ar[r] \ar[d] & \mathcal{F}_1 \ar[d] \\ \mathcal{O} \times \mathcal{F}_2 \ar[r] & \mathcal{F}_2 } \]

commutes. It suffices to prove commutativity after applying $i_*$. Consider

\[ \xymatrix{ \mathcal{O}' \times i_*\mathcal{F}_1 \ar[r] \ar[d] & i_*\mathcal{O} \times i_*\mathcal{F}_1 \ar[r] \ar[d] & i_*\mathcal{F}_1 \ar[d] \\ \mathcal{O}' \times i_*\mathcal{F}_2 \ar[r] & i_*\mathcal{O} \times i_*\mathcal{F}_2 \ar[r] & i_*\mathcal{F}_2 } \]

We know the outer rectangle commutes. Since $i^\sharp $ is surjective we conclude.

To finish the proof we have to prove the statement on the essential image of $i_*$. It is clear that $i_*\mathcal{F}$ is annihilated by $\mathcal{I}$ for any $\mathcal{O}$-module $\mathcal{F}$. Conversely, let $\mathcal{G}$ be a $\mathcal{O}'$-module with $\mathcal{I}\mathcal{G} = 0$. By definition of a closed subtopos there exists a subsheaf $\mathcal{U}$ of the final object of $\mathcal{D}$ such that the essential image of $i_*$ on sheaves of sets is the class of sheaves of sets $\mathcal{H}$ such that $\mathcal{H} \times \mathcal{U} \to \mathcal{U}$ is an isomorphism. In particular, $i_*\mathcal{O} \times \mathcal{U} = \mathcal{U}$. This implies that $\mathcal{I} \times \mathcal{U} = \mathcal{O} \times \mathcal{U}$. Hence our module $\mathcal{G}$ satisfies $\mathcal{G} \times \mathcal{U} = \{ 0\} \times \mathcal{U} = \mathcal{U}$ (because the zero module is isomorphic to the final object of sheaves of sets). Thus there exists a sheaf of sets $\mathcal{F}$ on $\mathcal{C}$ with $i_*\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{G}$. Since $i_*$ is fully faithful on sheaves of sets, we see that in order to define the addition $\mathcal{F} \times \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}$ and the multiplication $\mathcal{O} \times \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}$ it suffices to use the addition

\[ \mathcal{G} \times \mathcal{G} \longrightarrow \mathcal{G} \]

(given to us as $\mathcal{G}$ is a $\mathcal{O}'$-module) and the multiplication

\[ i_*\mathcal{O} \times \mathcal{G} \to \mathcal{G} \]

which is given to us as we have the multiplication by $\mathcal{O}'$ which annihilates $\mathcal{I}$ by assumption and $i_*\mathcal{O} = \mathcal{O}'/\mathcal{I}$. By construction $\mathcal{G}$ is isomorphic to the pushforward of the $\mathcal{O}$-module $\mathcal{F}$ so constructed. $\square$

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 08M2. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.