Loading web-font TeX/Caligraphic/Regular

The Stacks project

Lemma 13.37.3. Let \mathcal{D} be a triangulated category with direct sums. Let E_ i, i \in I be a family of compact objects of \mathcal{D} such that \bigoplus E_ i generates \mathcal{D}. Then every object X of \mathcal{D} can be written as

X = \text{hocolim} X_ n

where X_1 is a direct sum of shifts of the E_ i and each transition morphism fits into a distinguished triangle Y_ n \to X_ n \to X_{n + 1} \to Y_ n[1] where Y_ n is a direct sum of shifts of the E_ i.

Proof. Set X_1 = \bigoplus _{(i, m, \varphi )} E_ i[m] where the direct sum is over all triples (i, m, \varphi ) such that i \in I, m \in \mathbf{Z} and \varphi : E_ i[m] \to X. Then X_1 comes equipped with a canonical morphism X_1 \to X. Given X_ n \to X we set Y_ n = \bigoplus _{(i, m, \varphi )} E_ i[m] where the direct sum is over all triples (i, m, \varphi ) such that i \in I, m \in \mathbf{Z}, and \varphi : E_ i[m] \to X_ n is a morphism such that E_ i[m] \to X_ n \to X is zero. Choose a distinguished triangle Y_ n \to X_ n \to X_{n + 1} \to Y_ n[1] and let X_{n + 1} \to X be any morphism such that X_ n \to X_{n + 1} \to X is the given one; such a morphism exists by our choice of Y_ n. We obtain a morphism \text{hocolim} X_ n \to X by the construction of our maps X_ n \to X. Choose a distinguished triangle

C \to \text{hocolim} X_ n \to X \to C[1]

Let E_ i[m] \to C be a morphism. Since E_ i is compact, the composition E_ i[m] \to C \to \text{hocolim} X_ n factors through X_ n for some n, say by E_ i[m] \to X_ n. Then the construction of Y_ n shows that the composition E_ i[m] \to X_ n \to X_{n + 1} is zero. In other words, the composition E_ i[m] \to C \to \text{hocolim} X_ n is zero. This means that our morphism E_ i[m] \to C comes from a morphism E_ i[m] \to X[-1]. The construction of X_1 then shows that such morphism lifts to \text{hocolim} X_ n and we conclude that our morphism E_ i[m] \to C is zero. The assumption that \bigoplus E_ i generates \mathcal{D} implies that C is zero and the proof is done. \square


Comments (4)

Comment #4349 by awllower on

I think in the proof the composition is supposed to be ?

Comment #8351 by TheSentence on

I think we should consider the case that for some . Whenever for some , we can prove is isomorphism, which means we can stop the step for .

Comment #8958 by on

Well, the proof as written now works if , so we can just leave it as it is now.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.