Lemma 5.13.6. Let X be a Hausdorff and locally quasi-compact space. Let Z \subset X be a quasi-compact (hence closed) subset. Suppose given an integer p \geq 0, a set I, for every i \in I an open U_ i \subset X, and for every (p + 1)-tuple i_0, \ldots , i_ p of I an open W_{i_0 \ldots i_ p} \subset U_{i_0} \cap \ldots \cap U_{i_ p} such that
Z \subset \bigcup U_ i, and
for every i_0, \ldots , i_ p we have W_{i_0 \ldots i_ p} \cap Z = U_{i_0} \cap \ldots \cap U_{i_ p} \cap Z.
Then there exist opens V_ i of X such that we have Z \subset \bigcup V_ i, for all i we have \overline{V_ i} \subset U_ i, and we have V_{i_0} \cap \ldots \cap V_{i_ p} \subset W_{i_0 \ldots i_ p} for all (p + 1)-tuples i_0, \ldots , i_ p.
Proof.
Since Z is quasi-compact, there is a reduction to the case where I is finite (details omitted). Because X is locally quasi-compact and Z is quasi-compact, we can find a neighbourhood Z \subset E which is quasi-compact, i.e., E is quasi-compact and contains an open neighbourhood of Z in X. If we prove the result after replacing X by E, then the result follows. Hence we may assume X is quasi-compact.
We prove the result in case I is finite and X is quasi-compact by induction on p. The base case is p = 0. In this case we have X = (X \setminus Z) \cup \bigcup W_ i. By Lemma 5.13.4 we can find a covering X = V \cup \bigcup V_ i by opens V_ i \subset W_ i and V \subset X \setminus Z with \overline{V_ i} \subset W_ i for all i. Then we see that we obtain a solution of the problem posed by the lemma.
Induction step. Assume the lemma proven for p - 1. Set W_{j_0 \ldots j_{p - 1}} equal to the intersection of all W_{i_0 \ldots i_ p} with \{ j_0, \ldots , j_{p - 1}\} = \{ i_0, \ldots , i_ p\} (equality of sets). By induction there exists a solution for these opens, say V_ i \subset U_ i. It follows from our choice of W_{j_0 \ldots j_{p - 1}} that we have V_{i_0} \cap \ldots \cap V_{i_ p} \subset W_{i_0 \ldots i_ p} for all (p + 1)-tuples i_0, \ldots , i_ p where i_ a = i_ b for some 0 \leq a < b \leq p. Thus we only need to modify our choice of V_ i if V_{i_0} \cap \ldots \cap V_{i_ p} \not\subset W_{i_0 \ldots i_ p} for some (p + 1)-tuple i_0, \ldots , i_ p with pairwise distinct elements. In this case we have
T = \overline{V_{i_0} \cap \ldots \cap V_{i_ p} \setminus W_{i_0 \ldots i_ p}} \subset \overline{V_{i_0}} \cap \ldots \cap \overline{V_{i_ p}} \setminus W_{i_0 \ldots i_ p}
is a closed subset of X contained in U_{i_0} \cap \ldots \cap U_{i_ p} not meeting Z. Hence we can replace V_{i_0} by V_{i_0} \setminus T to “fix” the problem. After repeating this finitely many times for each of the problem tuples, the lemma is proven.
\square
Comments (0)